Make a right. Apparently. And can someone please remind me when Chrysler, GM and Ford took a stand on outsourcing?
Find News by Subject:
Category: News Blog
Earlier this week, we got one of those dreaded “I’m ok, but . . . ” phone calls from our daughter. A combination of completely bald tires and heavy rains led to a nasty three car pile-up. The Highway Patrol issued the offending driver a $1K fine for driving on bald tires. She claimed she knew nothing about cars—except to take her whip in for an oil change from time to time. Nobody at the shop warned her about the worn out tires. I’m all for mandatory annual safety inspections, which aren’t required in the land of the proctological emissions test (go figure). In fact, I’d like the state to check the headlights’ alignment, window tint levels and exhaust noise at the same time. In fact, a British style annual MOT requirement seems about right. The cost and hassle to our family would be significant; I’ve got six cars. But needs must. Your take?
Today’s been rather hectic, in a Swedish go-fish kind of way. I caught sight of this Bloomberg report on a possibile Chrysler-GM shotgun marriage this morning. And, somehow, it’s still there. “Chrysler LLC may be sending a message to President Barack Obama’s autos task force by saying the ‘best option’ for survival is a merger with General Motors Corp. that both sides have labeled dead.” ChryCo spinmeister insists that Bloomberg’s got it wrong: “We are in exclusive talks with Fiat.” Now that the supposed deal with Nissan is dead. And the one with Chery. And the previous talks with GM. Speaking of which, The General’s aide de camp, PR spinmeister Steve Harris, also ruled out an Alliance—I mean, alliance. Yes, well, JR didn’t want to marry Cally either. (You could say this doesn’t bode well for either automaker.) Now, some scary stuff . . .
Trollhättan – As a result of GM’s strategic review of the global Saab business the Saab Board announced today that it will file for reorganization under a self-managed Swedish court process to create a fully independent business entity that would be sustainable and suitable for investment.
The reorganization is a self-managed, Swedish legal process headed by an independent administrator appointed by the court who will work closely with the Saab management team. As part of the process, Saab will formulate its proposal for reorganization, which will include the concentration of design, engineering and manufacturing in Sweden. This proposal will be presented to creditors within three weeks of the filing. Pending court approval, the reorganization will be executed over a three-month period and will require independent funding to succeed.
Red light camera supporters insist that the devices are needed to prevent the common and deadly T-bone style of accident at intersections. In practice, however, automated ticketing lenses are more often positioned to photograph a different type of violation, one that rarely causes accidents. A review of US Department of Transportation statistics shows that an average motorist could drive a billion miles—the distance from Earth to Jupiter and back—before being involved in an accident that resulted from a motorist making a rolling stop on a right-hand turn.
[Thanks to Ola for the link and translation.]
I caught the following on fordmuscle.com. The author agreed to let me republish it here:
There’s an old saying, “Everyone is a capitalist on the way up and a socialist on the way down.” While GM’s circumstances are tragic, we need to let capitalism take its course. Propping up GM hurts the competitors who aren’t asking for handouts. It makes the playing field un-level. Ford is the fittest, and when resources are scarce, the fittest shall survive and the weak potentially go extinct. Ford stands to increase its market share dramatically if GM (and Chrysler) were allowed to fail. By doing so Ford would be able to make more cars, hire more workers, and be a better competitor in the global automotive market.
Transportation Secretary Ray La Hood is considering a transportation tax based on miles driven, to replace gasoline tax revenue. “We should look at the vehicular miles program where people are actually clocked on the number of miles that they traveled,” La Hood tells the Freep, echoing proposals being considered by Oregon, Idaho, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and North Carolina. La Hood argues that gasoline tax revenues “can not be relied on” to fund infrastructure maintenance, presumably because relatively high prices have caused a downturn in gas tax revenue. “One of the things I think everyone agrees with around reauthorization of the highway bill is that the highway trust fund is an antiquated system for funding our highways,” LaHood said. “It did work to build the interstate system and it was very effective, there’s no question about that. But the big question now is, We’re into the 21st Century and how are we going to take care of our infrastructure needs … with a highway trust fund that had to be plused up by $8 billion by Congress last year?” For La Hood the answer to that rhetorical question is “by putting GPS chips in your car and charging you by the mile.”
Now that’s its all over bar the shouting (Saab has filed for the Swedish equivalent of bankruptcy), the shouting begins. Saab’s new owners (themselves) say they need $1B to stay in the game, and they want GM to pay it. (Reparations?) Automotive News [sub] reports that GM is willing to surrender a big chunk of your taxes to cut bait and [Swedish] fish. But not a billion. “GM Europe’s head of communications Chris Preuss said GM was prepared to provide some funding for Saab but the brand needed outside money as well.” And who in their right mind would provide the lion’s share of this IV drip? “We have asked the Swedish government for loan guarantees for $600 million to give Saab a balance sheet as an independent unit which will allow it to continue.” The Swedish government has said no. So Saab is hitting up the European Investment Bank for a €500m loan. So . . . now what?
An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. WAS is being filed from Beijing until further notice.
Opel needs more money: Up until now, Opel had mentioned that they may need €1.8b in loan guarantees “just in case.” Now Manager Magazin reports that Opel will definitely need twice the amount. There are mounting indications that the German government will only part with the money if Opel is spun off and totally separate from GM. States where Opel has plants have indicated that they would take a stake. Also, there is pressure from Berlin that GM finally transfers the €1b which it owes Opel. Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel is still waiting for a viability concept promised, but not delivered, by Opel.
Read More >
[Editor’s Note: This is the third part of a four-part series by Dr. Rob Kleinbaum. Parts one and two are still available.]
What is fascinating about GM, and offers some hope, is that it really has two cultures. The one described above is an accurate depiction of the culture in North America and Western Europe but there is another in the rest of the world that is very different. The culture of GM’s operations in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Middle East, Russia and Eastern Europe, is much more progressive and it is in these areas that GM is doing very well. On almost all of the measures listed above, they would come out on the progressive side. Working for GM in Asia Pacific, Latin America or the Middle East, you would think you were in a completely different company. People are very forward looking, they are capable of making the tough decisions, they are business focused, debate is tolerated but discipline is enforced, relations with their labor force and dealers are usually positive, and authority is genuinely dispersed to the smaller business units within each of the regions.
Today, the Supervisory Board of Saab decided to declare bankruptcy, Automobilwoche [sub] writes. The 4000 employees of Saab are being informed at a meeting how the company will continue. The company is now under the supervision of an insolvency administrator. Since Sweden’s government had turned down bailout requests of the mother ship GM, according to Swedish media, one possible solution would be a merger of Saab with a spun-off Opel.
[Here’s a link to the document filed today at the court. The English version starts on page 7 of the pdf.]
Recent Comments