When GM introduced the Chevrolet Cruze to the market some three months ago, it wasn’t just launching a car, it was trying to change one of its most persistent perception problems. GM managers know that their firm has never built a memorably successful compact car, a fact that was underlined by President Obama’s bailout-era question “why can’t they build a Corolla?” The Cruze was supposed to change all that, but a short three months after its launch, even the hometown cheerleaders at the Detroit Free Press are beginning to wonder if GM is “running out of time to kick Cruze sales into high gear.” After all, the Cruze was just fifth on the C-Segment sales chart last month, losing out to such aging offerings as the Civic, Corolla, Focus and Elantra, all of which are due to be replaced within the next 3 to 12 months. And since the Crue took its time getting to the US market, one analyst concludes
As a result of having been in production two years, it will age more quickly. The relevance in the market is one of the things consumers are willing to pay premium for
This seems to reinforce the conclusion drawn by the WSJ’s Dan Neil who wrote of the Cruze
But I’m sorry to say Chevrolet’s compact car of tomorrow feels more like its car of this afternoon, about 3:48 p.m. This is a car of quickly expiring market advantages.














Recent Comments