Category: Toyota

Toyota Reviews

Toyota Motor Co., the world’s largest automaker, has been producing cars for more than 70 years. It wasn’t until after World War II, however, that production started to pick up. Toyota went from making 8,500 cars a year in 1955 to 600,000 in 1965. Models like the Toyopet and Land Cruiser hit the United States in 1957. Today Toyota is among the leaders when it comes to hybrid technology.
By on March 5, 2009

An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. This column will be filed from Berlin until further notice – if & when time allows.

We are the German government, and we are here to help you, Opel: The German government is still waiting for Opel to hand in a solid business plan that could be the basis of financial assistance. What Opel has submitted so far has been found inadequate. Finance Minister Steinbrueck today put Opel on notice that without solid information there will be no money decision. Volker Kauder, head of the CDU faction said: “It looks like they need help to come up with a concept. We’ll help ’em.”

Saab? Volvo? Bu yao! Chinese automakers Dongfeng and Geely said that they have not held any talks over a possible bid for General Motors’ Saab brand, Gasgoo says. A Dongfeng spokesman as unaware of any interest by his company in bidding for the Saab brand. A senior Geely executive, when asked about his company’s possible acquisition of Saab or other brands, told reporters: “No, we did not. We’re not interested in Saab or the other brands out there.” Media reports have also said Geely was in preliminary talks with Ford Motor about the sale of the US automaker’s Volvo car unit. This was likewise denied by Geely. This comes on the heels of the Chinese government warning their automakers to buy overseas assets.
Read More >

By on March 4, 2009

Think bankruptcy might be an option worth exploring for General Motors? Worried that the Volt might have been a tad too ambitious? Clearly you must be sick in the head. Reasonable people just don’t think that way. After all, why listen to bankruptcy lawyers and university researchers when you can get the truth straight from GM. You think those eggheads know more about GM than GM? Think about it. And while you’re suspending your disbelief, head down to GM’s Fastlane blog. You’ll get your facts straightened out faster than you can say “Stockholm Syndrome.”

Read More >

By on March 4, 2009

An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. This column will be filed from Berlin until further notice – if & when time allows.

Forster plays the—usual—jobs card: Opel will have to slim down its workforce, says GM Europe chief Carl-Peter Forster, “hopefully not more than 3,500 jobs.” That according to Automobilwoche [sub]. How many and where exactly is unclear—and will depend on how much money which government will fork over. Forster said in Geneva that Opel has surplus capacities of 30 percent.

Sumimasen, can you spare some billions? Japanese automakers are keeping up with the Joneses, or make that Tanakas: Japanese automakers are turning to government lending to secure operational funds, the Nikkei [sub] writes. Honda is considering borrowing from the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, Toyota is negotiating a five-year loan of about 200 billion yen, also from JBIC. Mitsubishi Motors has applied for a low-interest loan from the Development Bank of Japan. Honda intends to seek tens of billions of yen in dollar-denominated loans from JBIC for its US financing arm, American Honda Finance Corp. The carmaker aims to build up more cash for auto loans and leases. Toyota Financial Services Corp. has also approached JBIC to procure funds for its US financing unit, Toyota Motor Credit Corp. Nissan is double dipping—at the very least. They applied for a roughly 50 billion yen loan with the DBJ as well as a low-interest loan from the US government. It is also considering tapping JBIC loans.
Read More >

By on March 4, 2009

Last October, I wrote a series of articles comparing economical family sedans from the Land of the Rising Sun. Numerous readers challenged me to perform a similar comparison of similar cars from American manufacturers. Define “American.” [ED: just step back from the can of worms and walk away.] This time ’round, I’ve tested the Ford Fusion S, Chevrolet Malibu LS, and Chrysler Sebring LX with automatic transmissions and common, entry level features. While I anguished to find positive or negative attributes that would distinguish one Japanese car from another, evaluating the relative virtue of the American’s was a slam dunk piece of cake. In distant third place: the Chrysler Sebring LX.

Yankee Econo-Car Comparo: 3rd Place: Chrysler Sebring Car Review Rating

By on March 3, 2009

Toyota Financial Services has requested a $2B loan from the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, a government-backed lending institution. TFS says it needs the money to cover the higher cost of borrowing in the US. According to Automotive News [sub], “Toyota may be the first of a string of Japanese companies with high credit ratings to turn to state-backed loans prior to the closing of books for the business year at the end of March.” Toyota’s “implied” credit rating based on credit-default swaps is considerably lower than its current Moody’s rating, as fears grow about liquidity problems across the automotive industry. The money will come from a $5B fund established by the Japanese government to provide liquidity for firms which operate abroad. These funds are said to come from Japan’s $1T+ in foreign cash reserves, the world’s second-largest foreign currency reserves after China. Nissan and Mitsubishi have also said they will apply for loans from this fund.

By on March 3, 2009

Kevin writes:

I currently own a 2000 A6 Avant, and I’m moving from college to Chicago soon. I do love my car, except when it comes to paying the repair and gas bills.  I’ve given up on anything even pretending to be sporty and I’d rather rent a car for track days.

I’m a consultant so I have to drive regardless of weather conditions, but maintain a sort-of-professional look (I’m afraid an F-150 won’t make it). My budget is less than $15,000 (2nd hand cars), and looking for a safe, reliable vehicle that doesn’t need lots of visits to the mechanic.

Sajeev responds:

I would recommend getting a Japanese or American sedan/CUV for maximum durability, efficiency and ease of finding cheap replacement parts. Steven Lang has mentioned that Toyotas, Hondas and some Detroit models fare well in the used car market.  Which is good for you too: a last-gen Accord and the Ford Fusion have been reliable (in whatever short term evaluations I’ve seen) and are quite fun to drive to boot. One of my friends is a consultant (for one of the big firms) and his Accord EX fits the bill nicely.

Read More >

By on March 3, 2009

An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. This column will be filed from Berlin until further notice—if & when time allows.

Time is money: GM Europe is running out of both, Carl-Peter Forster said to today at the Geneva Autoshow, Automobilwoche [sub] reports. GM needs the requested €3.3B “as soon as possible” Forster said. He’s not counting on private investors: “Each discussion with a private investor takes months, half a year at least, and we don’t have that kind of time.” Foster also said that GM has “three plants too many” in Europe. German Economy Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg said today he will not be pressured into making a quick decision on granting state aid to General Motors’ Opel unit, Automotive News [sub] says. Germany is considering whether to support Opel after GM Europe unveiled a plan to spin off Opel and its UK sister brand Vauxhall to try to avert job cuts and plant closures.

Read More >

By on March 2, 2009

Dear God, will no one pull the plug on this company? I know the Obama administration needs to wait until March 31st to appear as if they’ve fully contemplated all the options. But even for me, a professional General Motors Death Watcher, charting the final dissolution of what was once the world’s largest automaker has become a painful pursuit. The breakup of the global empire. The raiding of the pension fund. The kow-towing to politicians. Automotive News [sub] gives us a way-point, reminding us that GM’s epic cash conflagration is getting worse, not better. 

In a conference call last week, CFO Ray Young said GM’s cash burn this year would be less than last year, which it put at $19.2 billion — but admitted the cash burn in 2009 would be “front-loaded.”

Translation: The short-term bleeding will continue. It will be hard in this quarter for GM to reduce its cash-burn much below the $5.2 billion consumed in the last three months of 2008. 

All this while GM inventory piles up, everywhere. The post-jump run-down is sobering stuff. One hopes.

Read More >

By on March 2, 2009

This morning’s Automotive News [sub] carries a highly critical report on Toyota’s reaction to the worldwide automotive meltdown. The bottom line: the Japanese automaker is too damn slow and overly cautious. “Toyota Motor Corp. is famed for its advance planning, obsessive attention to ‘what if’ scenarios and continuous improvement,” Hans Greimel writes. “Yet with the market collapsing, the world’s top automaker is stunned to a near standstill by an astonishing plunge from record profits to record losses in 12 short months.” That’s quite a statement, especially as it seems to be based on a single analyst’s analysis. Greimel trots out JPMorgan’s Takaki Nakanishi, who complains that there’s “nothing remotely innovative” in ToMoCo’s recent plans to cut $5.11 billion in fixed costs by the end of the year. What, no feng shui?

Read More >

By on March 2, 2009

An overview of what happened in other parts of the world while you were in bed. TTAC provides round-the-clock coverage of everything that has wheels. Or has its wheels coming off. This column will be filed from Berlin until further noticeif & when time allows.

Japan down again: Japan’s domestic sales of new cars, trucks and buses fell 32.4 percent year-on-year in February, declining for the seventh straight month, the Nikkei [sub] writes. This is the sharpest fall since May 1974, when sales were hit by the first oil shock. Sales in February totaled 218,212 vehicles, down from 322,613 a year earlier, the Japan Automobile Dealers Association said. The figures don’t include sales of mini-cars or mini-trucks. Toyota’s sales dropped 32 percent to 98,808 units, with sales of the Lexus luxury car plunging 63 percent. Nissan fell 35.2 percent to 40,694 units, while Honda sold 30,101 vehicles, 21.1 percent fewer than last year.

India coming back to life: Most Indian auto makers led by market leader Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. reported a continued rise in monthly sales, driven mainly by discounts, says the Nikkei [sub]. Analysts said if the sales continue to rise beyond March it may indicate a recovery in Asia’s third-biggest automobile market. Maruti, a unit of Suzuki, sold 79,190 cars, up 24.1 percent from 63,822 a year earlier. Total car sales at the Indian unit of Hyundai Motor Co. in February rose to 38,254 units from 29,001 units a year earlier.
Read More >

By on February 28, 2009

A UAW workers writes:

REMEMBER WORLD WAR 2? who did America & the World turn to in that time when Japan & Germany were murdering millions of people in the world – The WORLD turned to the Americans for help and how did America help win the war against Japan – I’ll tell you who it was, The Big 3 Auto Companies that’s who- FORD – GM & CHRYSLER – they rebuilt and retooled all their factories and plants so that they could build Tanks – and Jeeps and Trucks and Troop Carriers -Boat Guns and Ship Artillery Cannons – and many types of Weapons and other Equipment – Do you think that when World War 3 comes that Japan and other companies will retool their factories to help America – NO THEY WILL NOT. After 9/11 in New York, Who was it that gave 10 million dollars each? There was only 3 companies that gave that much and guess what else they gave? They gave Fleets of Cars and Trucks / SUVs’ and Building Spaces – It was the Big 3 -FORD -GM & Chrysler that’s who it was – I’ll tell you who else gave, it was USA Harley Davidson Motorcycles they gave 1 million dollars and a fleet of new Motorcycles for N.Y. Police Department – and with all that giving during one of our nations darkest time- Honda & Toyota and all the other foreign car companies DID NOT GIVE ONE PENNY to the people of the United States of America for 9/11 or Hurricane Katrina. Ford- GM & Chrysler Did.

Read More >

By on February 27, 2009

When Nissan introduced the Murano as a 2003 model, the styling raised more than a few eyebrows. In 2008, Nissan embarked on a Quest to redesign the machine as a less visually “intriguing” CUV. They tried to thread to proverbial needle: keep the Murano instantly recognizable while updating every body panel and adding one of the most bizarre snouts available on any automobile at any price. As the pimply-faced high school geek cum dot-com billionaire proved, looks can be deceiving. Does the same hold true for the “It Came from Outer Space (or France)” Murano S?

Review: 2009 Nissan Murano S AWD Car Review Rating

By on February 27, 2009

Consumer Reports has released its annual auto issue and scorecard, and the results are hardly shocking. CR loves them some Toyota, Honda and Subaru, singling out the big H as building the most reliable lineup of vehicles (Element excepted). Toyota came in second, with the Prius winning top spot in CR’s new “value” ranking. Only Toyota’s Yaris and FJ Cruiser were unable to earn a “recommend” grade from the report. Mercedes has improved its reliability, reckons CR, but European brands are still lagging. On the American front, Ford is singled out as the high point among the American automakers, as “some Ford models now rival their competitors” from Japan. Too bad they’re the F150 and Flex, which compete for a shrinking market segments. Unfortunately, that’s as good as the news gets for Detroit.

Read More >

By on February 26, 2009

GM and Chrysler both must go bankrupt. Only then, out of the ashes, can a new company emerge, taking control of the best assets of both companies, with a new management team and a clean balance sheet.  All financed by private equity and bank debt, not the government, and free from the political machinations that would result. It’s pure business—of making and selling vehicles here in North America and in selected markets around the world. It’s past time for the old empire of GM to make room for a new vision of the future based on market realities.

Before we examine the future, it’s worth repeating: anyway you slice and dice General Motors (and its sister sibling Chrysler), there’s not a chance to resuscitate the company in its present form. Trying to do this out of bankruptcy makes no sense at all, even with various parties making accommodations of trading debt for equity, wage/benefit cuts, or simply making “shared sacrifices.” In the end, the balance sheet still has too much debt, brands and dealers. Not mention the fact that the existing management team (and BoD) has proven itself incompetent after years of failing to address its structural problems in a meaningful way.

Extricating Chrysler and GM from this mess will require the “mother of all private equity” equity deals, the biggest one yet, and likely one of the most profitable when the company goes public. And that’s the New General Motors Corporation in 2012. Here’s how it works.

From the bankruptcy, the judge allows the sale (via Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code) of assets to raise proceeds for the debtor. The beauty of the asset sale comes from the ability to cherry pick the best assets. GM has a lot of assets that are worth lots of money once they’re free of the associated liabilities. So a new buyer gets to assemble a new GM out of the ashes of the old.

The way I see it, a new company would acquire Chevrolet and Cadillac (and some models from its other brands), associated assembly plants, its huge trove of patents and marques, and some of its foreign operations (like Canada, Mexico, Latin America and Eastern Europe). In North America, the new company would not acquire any franchise agreements; instead it would sign “operating agreements” with dealers for the interim as it figures out the right-sizing of its ultimate distribution network. And best of all, it would have a new management team properly motivated to make decisions that maximize value and profits unburdened by any legacies.

The New GM would not take the union contracts with it. Those were signed with the old companies. Many hourly workers would have the choice to gain employment with the New GM, at parity labor wages and benefits with the transplants. Work rules would also be re-written to mirror those of Honda and Toyota, not echoing Detroit’s featherbedding past. Better to have a good paying job than no job at all.

As for the old GM and Chrysler, the debtors wind down through a process of selling the remaining assets to others and dividing up the proceeds among creditors as directed by the Court. For example, the Chinese JVs should be sold back to their partners (SAIC and Wuling) for cash and the rights to use certain marques within certain geographies (like Buick only in China). The remainder of the foreign assets, like Opel, Vauxhall, and Holden, can be sold to others (like foreign governments?) or simply shut down.

As for suppliers, many will fail. But those critical for the support of the new GM will have their pre-petition claims accelerated and paid. The Court can determine that this will be necessary to enhance and preserve the value of the assets being sold to the New GM; without key suppliers, there would be nothing to sell (i.e., if the new company can’t get parts).

For private equity investors and their lenders, the new GM would be acquired at the bottom, not the top, of the auto market. My guess is that these assets are worth at least $20 billion. That’s cash that goes to satisfy the liabilities of the old GM. Operating cash for the New GM would be provided by commercial lenders and debt offerings—all untainted by the old GM.

So imagine a New GM free from its past and run by private equity investors, not the government. Two strong brands—Chevrolet and Cadillac and a minor brand of Jeep—with the best vehicles and dealers from the old GM. Perhaps it would have a US market share of 15 percent, making it smaller than Toyota but similar to Ford. And when the car market comes back (and it will), the New GM can be a successful and vibrant company. That’s what’s called a real investment.

By on February 26, 2009

I admit, I have a strange fascination with watching cars crash. And though large, heavy cars can cause some of the most dangerous accidents, there’s something particularly satisfying about watching a small car hit the wall (or get hit by a large, heavy car). As an American I feel hard-wired to expect smaller cars to explode into a million pieces of tin foil and socialized medicine every time I see one making a slow-mo impact in a crash test. But the glory days of “hoo boy!” moments in compact crash tests seem to be coming to a close. Toyota’s tiny iQ just logged a five-star rating from Europe’s NCAP crash testers, and as this video shows, the drama just never shows up. A cocoon of airbags, some brilliant crumpling and surprising side-impact resilience take a lot of the “sucks to be that dummy” entertainment value from the iQ test video. Oh well. I guess it’s time to move on to watching Chinese car crash tests. Schadenfreude doesn’t feed itself.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber