By on August 3, 2007

melbourne_australia_ek_bourke_street_jul07.jpgAny blog post that starts off "With apologies for my carbon footprint" isn't about to describe the virtues of Drive-In movies. The PC mea culpa comes from Ethan Kent, the comely Veep of Project for NYC-based Project for Public Spaces (PPS), a nonprofit organization with a not-so-hidden agenda: "If you plan cities for cars and traffic, you get cars and traffic. If you plan for people and places, you get people and places." Kent's just returned from Melbourne, Australia and he likes what he sees. For example, the city is taxing long term parking spaces AU $400 per year (rising to AU $800 next year). Melbourne City Council will receive AU $5 million a year from the AU $19m to AU $38.5m to fund urban and transport improvements. Kent pronounces Melbourne's automotive purge an excellent starting point for his kind of urban planning: "At first glance, one might assume that the successful revitalization of Melbourne's downtown was the result of the city's efforts to drive automobiles out of the central business district. But traffic reduction was only one piece of the puzzle. Melbourne's renaissance was accomplished by focusing on the improvement, democratization and vitality of the city's public spaces."

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

6 Comments on “Melbourne a Model for NYC Urban Planning?...”


  • avatar

    hasn’t this failed miserably in several US town experiments?

  • avatar
    MW

    I love my car, but I don’t love driving it through crowded urban/suburban areas. Bring on the mass transit, bikeways and pedestrian malls. Using my car to run every small errand close to home makes about as much sense as using my bike to bring home bags of mulch from Home Depot.

  • avatar
    carguy

    Having lived in Melbourne for more than 14 years I would advise not to believe a word of it. Melbourne has traffic and transit problems just like every other city of its size.

  • avatar
    Robert Schwartz

    This is absurd. NYC is the most expensive place in the country to keep a car. Garage spaces can cost more than medium sized houses in other cities. Furthermore, the city has more public transit than anywhere else in the US.

  • avatar
    nyc

    Which is exactly why we don’t need cars…only 5% of commuters use cars to get to Manhattan below 60th yet the traffic is horrible and huge amounts of space are used for cars.

    Don’t get me wrong, I love driving but cars just take up too much space for a place like NY.

  • avatar
    postjosh

    furthermore, manhattan long term parkers already pay between $300 & $800 per year in taxes on their spaces. and i mean u.s. dollars.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber