By on March 26, 2008

31mits1m_m.jpgThe Age reports that the last of the great V8 Interceptors… Hold on, that's not it. Right. The last Australian-built Mitsubishi will roll off the line at Tonsley Park this Thursday, ending 28 years of production Down Under. Since it took over a Chrysler plant in 1980, Mitsu has built over a million cars in Australia. Production peaked back in 1997, when the Japanese automaker built 58,391 Magna sedans for domestic and export markets. Mitsubishi imports have seen strong demand, but the domestically-built 380 sedan will soon be sleeping with the fishes. Although Mitsu's laying off a thousand workers, it's not a post-apocalyptic scenario. They're receiving what's being called "the best-ever redundancy package in the automotive industry:" up to two years of severance pay. 

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “After 28 Years, Mitsubishi Ends Aussie Production...”


  • avatar
    menno

    They should do a “Valiant Special Edition” for the last 50 cars tomorrow.

    Probably too late now.

  • avatar
    yankinwaoz

    Mitsubishi Australia bet the company on the wrong horse… a big motored sedan (their new 380). It is actually one hell of a car. But in these days of expensive fuel, no one wants a huge 3.8 liter motor.

    Shades of GM there…

    Too bad. Their Magnas were wonderful (old Chevy kind of wonderful… not luxury).

  • avatar
    John R

    Not a bad looking ride, but its so anonmyous it would easily get confused with anything else on the street.

    I think Mitsu realizes that middle of the road bread and butter may not be for them.

  • avatar
    L47_V8

    yankinwaoz :
    March 26th, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Mitsubishi Australia bet the company on the wrong horse… a big motored sedan (their new 380). It is actually one hell of a car. But in these days of expensive fuel, no one wants a huge 3.8 liter motor.

    Shades of GM there…

    Too bad. Their Magnas were wonderful (old Chevy kind of wonderful… not luxury).

    I love my Diamante (TJ Magna/Verada). It’s a sad day, but looking back over the 380’s sales numbers since introduction, it wasn’t at all unexpected.

  • avatar
    L47_V8

    John R :
    March 26th, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    Not a bad looking ride, but its so anonmyous it would easily get confused with anything else on the street.

    I think Mitsu realizes that middle of the road bread and butter may not be for them.

    It’s telling that nobody is able to realize the 380 is a lightly restyled 9th-generation Galant. It’s the same car with different front and rear bodywork, and the Australian version hasn’t ever offered the base 4G69 2.4L four-cylinder (why???), only the optional 6G75 3.8L V6, which is optional in the US. The 380’s interior is identical to the Galant’s but for being RHD, and future plans for the Australian market are to build the Galant equivalent in Normal, IL, and export it down under.

  • avatar
    Michal

    I live close to the factory here in Adelaide. The big V6 market has been falling steadily for many years, with Ford’s Falcon sales being slashed as well. Only the Commodore is doing well due to undying local support and exports. There are two tribes in Australia, the Fords and Holdens. They hate each other but when anything else appears on the market they band together to despise the competition.

    The locally produced Camry/Aurion fill the niche for those who want something other than Ford/Holden, leaving Mitsubishi out on the lurch.

    The 380 isn’t a bad car, but it suffered from initial poor sales that lead to a slashing of prices ($35k down to $28k for the base model within a year). That did no end of wonders for the model’s resale value and image.

    The Tonsley Park factory was on life support for many years with regular government hand outs. When the closure announcement came no one was suprised. I would like to see a small or medium 4 cylinder car produced in Australia. The Ford Focus will be locally made from 2010 but more needs to be done. The market has shifted away from fuel hungry large vehicles.

  • avatar
    Geotpf

    In the US, 4 cylinder engines are the midsized sedan’s bread and butter, with V6s being typically 20% of sales or so. Not offering one for the 380 was probably a very large mistake.

  • avatar
    JeffDOZ

    This is a true case of mistaken self-identity. The rear of the car was nice, the front was lost, ie: Edsel. If the front was aggressive, ie: evo style it wouldve sold. But what the heck does ‘380’ stand for?

    My take:
    It shuldve had a nicer, smoother aggressive nose. It shouldve been AWD. It shouldve been called 260 (2.6 V6 or whatever size it is), and 380 for the 3.8. And maybe a 430 for the V8 (no offense Ferrari). Then it wouldve sold.

    Why do all these manufacturers build a Front drive V6, and then say how they are going to take sales off Ford and Holden’s big cars which are V6 or V8 and REAR drive. Aussies like to tow their boats and caravans with their cars, and small front drive V6’s dont cut the mustard. Ditto to Toyota with it’s Camry based Aurion – It aint gonna WORK! it’s not a rear drive platform that aussies like, and YOU (Toyota and Mitsubishi) Aint gonna fool the public.

    Just my take

  • avatar
    Michal

    JeffDOZ, Mitsubishi already tried the AWD Magna and it failed. Redesigning the Galant for AWD would have been prohibitively expensive. Apart from adding weight, cost, and increasing fuel consumption, the majority of drivers would never notice the difference.

    The Australian market has declared large sedans must have rear wheel drive. However the vast bulk of Commodores and Falcons are sold to fleet buyers. Did you only 15% of Commodores are sold to private buyers, according to smh.com.au? I know many people with rear wheel drive V6 sedans and only a small handful even have tow bars, negating the argument that people buy RWD because they tow. Not sure how a 380 counts as a “small” V6 car either. Ford/Holden fought to get the Toyota Aurion reclassified as a ‘medium-large’ car so it couldn’t officially compete in their market segment. Fortunately they failed as it was plainly obvious a few centimetres in length hardly makes a world of difference.

    I personally liked the 380’s front and didn’t find the rear appealing. The old style misted rear lights looked out of place when compared to clear, crisp, bright tail lights. The VRX model had comical thin vertical strip indicators that didn’t match the stop lights.

  • avatar
    L47_V8

    The 380 VR-X is directly equivalent to the 2004-2006 Galant GTS in the US. Same rear lights. It had different wheels and a slightly different body kit, to go along with the different front bumper/headlamp treatment.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber