AutoblogGreen reports that Brazil is launching a "diplomatic offensive" to promote its sugarcane ethanol exports to the EU, culminating at this November's World Biofuel Summit in São Paulo. Underlying the push: a Brazilian ethanol glut that American corn farmers have sworn their lives to keep on the other side of the border (and yes, we do have a border). Speaking to the Europeans, Brazil's Director of Energy tried to contrast Brazilian sugar-based ethanol and American corn-based ethanol. André Caranha Correa arguies that his countries product does not impact foodstocks. Of course, Brazilian ethanol does present a number of less-than-feel-good challenges, from widespread ecological impacts to the near-slave labor conditions of workers in the sugar industry. But hey, what else are charm offensives for?
Find Reviews by Make:
Read all comments
Good luck to Brazil getting agricultural products or byproducts into the EU. The only place with stronger protectionist policies for agriculture is Western Europe, possibly Japan.
Not only that, but net environmental effect a huge boom in demand for Brazilian sugar cane ethanol may actually be worse than current fossil fuel emmisions given Brazil’s clearcutting, burning and generally unsustainable agricultural practices.
I wish US ethanol proponents would look to Brazil instead of here at home. Brazil is more suited for ethanol development than the US, if such a thing can be said. It has a lower demand for energy per capita than the US, and abundant land on which to grow bio-fuel crops.
Though I believe ethanol to be economically destructive in the US, it would be less-so if we imported it from Brazil and left our breadbasket to produce bread.
Though I believe ethanol to be economically destructive in the US, it would be less-so if we imported it from Brazil and left our breadbasket to produce bread.
Until the sugar crisis hits. Then the cries would be to leave Brazil’s “sugarbasket” to produce sugar.
Until the sugar crisis hits. Then the cries would be to leave Brazil’s “sugarbasket” to produce sugar.
Wait a sec….don’t we mainly use high fructose corn syrup in everything we eat these days? I don’t think we’d have to be worried.
Any carving up of the Brazilian rainforest for biofuels is extremely destructive environmentally, From the point of view of carbon impact, so much carbon is sequestered in an acre of rainforest in both the soil and the biomass that it would take a few hundred years of growing biofuels to repay the carbon debt caused by clearing the land. So buying the stuff from brazil is no environmental panacea. Actually, even clearing new land in the US to grow biofuels creates a carbon debt of 30-100 years.
John Williams :
May 14th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
Until the sugar crisis hits. Then the cries would be to leave Brazil’s “sugarbasket” to produce sugar.
Wait a sec….don’t we mainly use high fructose corn syrup in everything we eat these days? I don’t think we’d have to be worried.
In large part due to protectionist policies that limit the importation of sugar.