Who knew we'd break Tesla Death Watch double digits in the space of a few minutes? Still, ours is not to question why. Oh wait; it is. So why did California give Tesla Motors a tax break for production of their "Model S" lithium-ion-powered (or part lithium-ion powered) Model S sedan? The churlish amongst you might suggest it has something to do with Tesla customer and California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's place on the Roadster's waiting list. Small business owners in The Golden State have another perspective. KCBS reports that "Dr. T.J. Rogers, CEO of Cypress and chairman of Sunpower, moved his wafer manufacturing from California to Texas and Minnesota to reduce costs. He said he is outraged that the state would not offer the same type of deal [seven to nine percent off tax on equipment purchases] for small businesses like his. 'I can’t afford to run a plant here [in California] because every time I put in a new piece of equipment and try to upgrade the plant I have to pay an extra six percent on top of what the equipment costs.'" Democratic CA State Treasurer Bill Lockyer gets it. "When does [a tax subsidy] become just a gift for behavior that would have happened anyhow, or does it really bring a business to California or have it really expand?” Of course, this is an entirely theoretical discussion…
Find Reviews by Make:
Read all comments
Ahhhh Tesla,
I hope the sedan “production” is better than the mythical sports car.
Why would ANYONE locate a new auto manufacturing plant in the Bay Area? Other than Manhattan, I can’t imagine a place with higher labor and land costs, PLUS the crazy enviromental regs that blanket California.
I’d say that decision is proof the Tesla is more of a stock market hype manufacturer than a company interested in producing a product.
I do have an idea for the name of the new sedan “Zap II”.
“for small businesses like his”
Cypress Semiconductor is a publicly traded company with a market capitalization of $3.4 billion and annual sales in the $1 billon range. Hardly a small business.
That said, personally I think all governments at all levels should be prohibited from giving selective tax breaks and subsidies to favored companies.
It would seem there is a lot of cheap industrial facilities the big 2.8 and their suppliers have available to produce this car. Likely ample tax breaks in these rusty belt states.
Wafer boy is going to get a nice surprise in Texas. They will likely want “use” tax on all his capital equipment at a rate of over 2% of estimated value per year. They like to make their own estimate of value too.
Good luck selling anything at it’s appraised value.
“Wafer boy” isn’t going to be surprised by anything in Texas. Cypress’ second wafer fab was built in Round Rock (North of Austin) 21 years ago and remains one of the company’s main manufacturing facilities to this day.
for small businesses like his”
Cypress Semiconductor is a publicly traded company with a market capitalization of $3.4 billion and annual sales in the $1 billon range.
I think they’re talking about SunPower Corporation specifically …. which I see is only on track to hit a run rate of a billion in revenue by about now … OK nevermind that’s pretty funny, but c’mon TJ, move everything to Texas!
I agree with the earlier comment about unequal application of taxes. Subsidies should be considered illegal, if not unconstitutional.
Making PV modules is a relatively energy and capital intensive process. Labor costs are not that much of a factor as their is little to no touch labor involved.
California has the most expensive electricity in Contiguous US. I could write a medium sized book about all the policy shortcomings that factor into this, but suffice to say the CA is amongst the LAST places you want to put a manufacturing facility for most things.