By on November 6, 2008

The Detroit Free Press finally gets it. “GM’s report Friday will be so dismal that the federal government will be forced to decide whether the U.S. auto industry will survive, people familiar with the situation told the Free Press.” Don’t be fooled by the “people familiar” routine. This is the Freep’s editorial team acknowledging GM’s acknowledgement that they’re fucked. Without federal aid, they’re done. The fact that Mssrs. Wagoner, (GM) Nardelli (Chrysler), Mulally (Ford) and Gettlefinger (UAW) are meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today, the day before GM announces its Q3 bloodbath, is hardly a coincidence. Nor is the unprecedented timing. For the first time in recent history, both GM AND Ford will reveal their respective meltdowns on the same day. The basic idea is simple enough: if the news is bad enough, SOMETHING MUST BE DONE! Throw in Barack Obama’s victory and you have a perfect storm of federal teat sucking.

“President-elect Obama understands you can’t have an economy that doesn’t make things,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. pronounced in her usual, profoundly misleading way.) And as we predicted, the cheerleading Freep joins the parade of pundits quoting the highly suspect Center for Automotive Research report that claims “if the Detroit automakers cut U.S. operations by 50%, 2.5 million jobs could be lost in 2009. Of those, 250,000 would come from automakers, 800,000 would come from suppliers, and 1.4 million other jobs from a ripple effect.” It’s all coming together nicely, provided you aren’t the taxpayer footing the bill.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “Bailout Watch 150: What’s Bad News for GM is Good News for GM...”


  • avatar
    TexN

    The bailout is going to happen so I won’t waste time bemoaning that fact. I would hope/expect that the following is a part of the plan:
    1) the replacement of the executives who created this mess
    2) no bonuses, golden parachutes, etc. for remaining staff
    3) loans must be repaid i.e. non-forgiveable
    4) performance metrics so that progress can be measured

    Even if these conditions are met (which I know WON’T happen), thousands and thousands of jobs will be lost. Oh yeah: and GM and/or Chrysler will STILL go bankrupt in 2-3 years.

  • avatar
    bluecon

    The USA is also broke. What is $25 billion of soon to be monopoly money?

    The government is seeing no more capital gains revenues, a large increase in unemployment is bubbling up and who is going to pay for that huge government bureaucracy?

    As GM goes so Goes the Nation will prove to be prophetic.

  • avatar
    Airhen

    Besides the executives, to be fair we need to include the unions for their waste, corruption and worker intimidation as part of the problem. If I had billions of dollars, the last thing I would do is want to buy or finance a company that has the UAW around it’s neck.

  • avatar
    mikey610

    How can people take this CAR report seriously? Yes, any time the auto industry is involved you can multiply big numbers (jobs) by big numbers (salaries/wages) and you get huge (misleading) numbers…but this is a completely unrealistic scenario.

    Companies that go Ch 11 do not simply go away one day and put people out on the street. They still employ people. Employees who are downsized/laid-off find other jobs…Companies restructure and actually make money (and maybe even pay taxes)

    I would say I can’t believe anyone would take this CAR report seriously, but it IS the federal government we are talking about.

  • avatar
    jolo

    The idiot Cole, who runs CAR, knows that the numbers are not that high. He knows that if they go under, his financing goes out the door with them and he’s out of a cushy job. He makes it sound worse than it is so that the automakers get bailed out. He’s looking out for his ass and could care less about the number of workers who could lose their jobs. He’s the son of a former exec at one of the auto companies. Guess where his priorities lie?

  • avatar
    Kurt.

    I knew someone would spin in “the perfect storm” analogy sooner or later…

  • avatar
    slinkster

    All of this talk about the unions hamstringing GM begs the issue. If foreign manufacturers have such a pricing advantage over domestic manufacturers then switching to off-shore divisions would be called for. GM, for example, has had positions in Isuzu, Subaru, Suzuki (I believe), Daewoo, Holden, Fiat, Opel, Vauxhall and Saab. They build vehicles in South America and China. They assemble V-6 engines and other parts in China as well. Geez, they even cross-manufacture with Toyota, in the U.S.!

    In other words, they have quite an extensive foreign portfolio of their own to draw on.

    So I think all of this talk about unions is really a diversion to mask the real problem- bad products resulting from bad product decisions. As a matter of fact, I think that the real problem lies in an amazing statistic I had read a while back. Honda has 5 times the number of engineers that GM has!

    No wonder the execs at GM would rather coast than develop new products. They may not have any other choice.

  • avatar
    joeaverage

    They want to go broke to shed the unions and benefits packages.

  • avatar
    CarnotCycle

    I wonder how long the rest of the world will continue to loan us cash to do idiotic things like prop up disasters like GM? Fact is, all this bail-out of the Ivy League Alumni gang is utterly dependent on Asians and Arabs lending poor Uncle Sam some coin.

    What if the United States Treasury has its bond auction next week and no one shows up? Lady Liberty checks start bouncing like tots on a trampoline, that’s what. Only option at that point is to go down to the Federal Reserve and by law (!) command the Federal Reserve to buy these increasingly junk-like bonds. Of course the Fed doesn’t have any cash, so then they have to print some…ahhh, Zimbabwanomics. We’re fuc*ed.

  • avatar
    Runfromcheney

    I will be satisfied if when they hand out the bailouts, every big three exec except for Jim Press, Bob Lutz, and Alan Mulally gets fired.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber