By on November 12, 2008

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has announced that the $700b government rescue program will not be used to purchase troubled assets as originally planned. Just like that. I swear. MSNBC reports that turnabout is fair play. “The administration decided that using billions of dollars to buy troubled assets of financial institutions at the current time was ‘not the most effective way’ to use the $700 billion bailout package.” That said, the TS isn’t totally shit-canning the previous plan: “Paulson said the administration will continue to use $250 billion of the program to purchase stock in banks as a way to bolster their balance sheets and encourage them to resume more normal lending.” So, that leaves $450b, right? Where’s that going to go now? “He announced a new goal for the program to support financial markets, which supply consumer credit in such areas as credit card debt, auto loans and student loans.” Good news for the domestics? Not overmuch. Any recovery in the auto loan biz will still be chasing diminishing demand. To wit: Toyota’s been hawking the Hell out of its zero percent financing and its October sales dropped 25 percent.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

13 Comments on “Bailout Watch 169: Sec. Paulson Changes the Game...”


  • avatar
    indi500fan

    Actually that’s a good thing. What would Nancy, Harry, and Barry do with dead factory real estate like GM Janesville anyway?

  • avatar
    TexN

    Here’s an idea, Hank: How about you give us taxpayers back OUR freaking money!?!? Can we just pull the handle and flush all of these idiots in Washington right down the toilet?

  • avatar
    taxman100

    It’s a $700 billion slush fund for politicians to do with as they like.

    People think union leaders are bad, but they are pikers compared to Washington.

  • avatar

    To wit: Toyota’s been hawking the Hell out of its zero percent financing and its October sales dropped 25 percent.

    Which means nothing if nobody qualifies for the loan.

    Not that I think that this will work, but Toyota’s sales would be better if more people qualified for this 0% deal.

  • avatar
    Mike the loser

    I think that Bailout will not help, but as far as Bush and Paulson go, no one cares. Both will be out in 3 months and Obama does not want to enter the office Big 2.1 dead or about to.

  • avatar

    Dorri732 :

    Down the rabbit hole, or what?

    The current crisis is caused by bad paper, so the way out of it is to write more bad paper?

    GM was giving 0% loans to folks with 350 FICO scores! Toyota’s more prudent lending policy is a BAD idea?

    Help me out here: can no one say “overdue market contraction?”

  • avatar

    Robert, I agree with you. I was just pointing out that Toyota’s sales were down, not because demand was down, but because credit isn’t as available as it once was.

    I think that we agree that this unavailability of easy credit is a good thing, long term.

  • avatar
    autonut

    @Robert,

    There is a market contraction and there is a global recession. We are having the latter. I think Paulson backpedals or side pedals, because his brainstorm turned out to be brain fart. Except we, the people, will be indulging Nancy’s spending fantasies, and they are much loftier then Sarah Paulin’s Newman-Marcus spending spree.

  • avatar
    Lichtronamo

    Here’s the problem –

    GM needs money to live another day. Obama, Pelosi and Reid want to give them money (that the Fed doesn’t really have). Giving them money will come with strings about the types of products they must build, where they must build them and who must build them. Such strings are a continuation of GM’s failed business structure (probably minus executive compensation). Thus in the long run, nothing is really changed and Government Motors will continue to loose market share and fail to be a viable going concern.

  • avatar
    guyincognito

    WTF?? Purchase stock in banks? Why do we want that? Purchasing illiquid securities made a little sense because, in theory, they would fetch more at auction than we bought them for. So our $700B investment could have generated a profit and we would convert illiquid securities back to liquid assets in the process. It was an emergency measure that would simply get the market trading again. Instead we’re irreversibly nationalizing our banks and god knows what else. Luckily, our government officials are carefully screened for selfless and honorable behavior…

  • avatar
    menno

    All I have to say is this.

    Nations with “nationalized socialist” automotive industries end up building cars like the TRABANT of East Germany. You know, cotton seed plastic body panels. Solid frames under the front & the rear suspension and a mid-section “crush zone” (you know, where the people sit). Two-stroke stinker motor. 26 horsepower.

    I recall reading that folks behind the iron curtain (didn’t matter which country) had to:

    a) pay up front for the entire cost of the car, which amounted to about 3 to 5 years wages for the average person

    b) had no choice as to what they got, not even color

    c) “enjoyed” a waiting period AFTER paying for the car of 3 to 8 years

    d) could not find parts once they got the car(outside of the black market – i.e. stolen bits)

    Put another way, just imagine a car company run like the US Post Office and you’ll get what I mean.

    God help us!

  • avatar
    creamy

    “It’s a $700 billion slush fund for politicians to do with as they like.”

    actually it is $2 trillion dollars that the fed and the treasury secretary can do with as they like: Fed Defies Transparency Aim in Refusal to Disclose.

    besides giving the fed and the sec treas our money in the first place, politicians have little say over what happens with that money now.

  • avatar
    charly

    Menno, you’re right. Renault was nationalized by the French socialist goverment in the 1980’s and was chaptered 7 a few years later.

    Oh wait, it wasn’t

    And nobody remembers Volkswagen. They have been gone tits up ages ago.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber