By on December 22, 2008

When Chrysler stuck its nose in the bailout trough, the ailng American automaker’s executives  had to wonder what the Hell anyone within the company could possibly tell lawmakers/money givers about Chrysler’s viability. Except, you know, the fact that they don’t have any. But never underestimate the power of positive PR or, as we call it around here, bullshit. To wit: former ToMoCo Prez and current ChryCo co-Prez Jim Press’ comments to Automotive News [sub, AN]  last week. “He suggested that Chrysler could show the way to a sustainable model for a smaller U.S. auto industry. ‘If there’s one company in America that can build high-craftsmanship, innovative vehicles, it’s Chrysler,’ Press said.” Hey, is Jimbo saying American can’t build high-craftsmanship, innovative vehicles? Anyway, down ye olde rabbit hole we go…

“Chrysler will build vehicles that have premium features but are affordable to consumers. Press said the 2009 Dodge Ram 1500 pickup signals the company’s direction. ‘If Mercedes-Benz built a pickup truck, that’s what it would be, said Press.”

And now, the punchline…

“He said Chrysler is making premium vehicles from the ground up, while ‘GM and Ford are making basic cars and ‘gingerbreading’ them up to premium.”

Does he actually believe that? C’mon. No way. Really? But there is a certain… King Lear quality to his last quote.

“Press said Chrysler’s next generation of vehicles will demonstrate ‘what America could become if we could buy the time.'”

My kingdom for an Altima?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

31 Comments on “Chrysler Co-Prez Jim Press is Insane...”


  • avatar
    stevelovescars

    Wow, how much is Cerberus paying this guy? I Hope it’s enough for him to buy a new mirror to look into each morning.

  • avatar
    John R

    Does Press know that the Sebring exists?

  • avatar
    Hippo

    They get the big bucks because they are like pro poker players.
    They can speak this stuff into the camera without cracking up.

  • avatar
    Blobinski

    What a complete load of elephant dung. I guess after telling yourself lies for so long you believe them along with your zombie followers. WOW.

  • avatar
    menno

    My wife took one look at the then new Dodge Journey interior at the Detroit Auto Show last January, and commented something along the lines of rubbermaid and playskool…

    Top of the line stuff, eh, Jim?

  • avatar
    TexN

    I can’t help but wonder if the ToMoCo execs read crap like this and think to themselves, “WTF were WE thinking for keeping this idiot around as long as we did!?!?”

  • avatar
    nudave

    Time for executive urinalysis testing?

  • avatar
    no_slushbox

    “And let me tell you about our amazing Dodge Sprinter van, if Mercedes-Benz built a van, that’s what it would be.”

    Assistant whispers in Jim’s ear.

    “Oh, wait, strike that last part.”

  • avatar
    Cicero

    So then if Mercedes Benz built a compact sedan, it would be a Sebring? Oh wait, it does, and it isn’t.

  • avatar
    Gardiner Westbound

    I nominate Press for the 2008 Lutzie.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    If Mercedes-Benz built a pickup truck, that’s what it would be, said Press.”

    Wow.

    Mercedes, essentially, built the Sebring, Caliber, Compass, Patriot, Aspen and Avenger. Between those and their own stellar quality, I don’t think Merc is exactly the name to drop.

    “Press said Chrysler’s next generation of vehicles will demonstrate ‘what America could become if we could buy the time.’”

    I’m also starting to suspect that either Toyota made Jim Press look much, much better, or things at Chrysler are much, much worse than we know and Jim’s just been given a lot of money to fill space.

    Or Chrysler’s going to somehow magically pull it’s ass from the fire for fourth or fifth time.

  • avatar
    Deepsouth

    I am not sure of the dollar amount Chrysler lured Press away with from Toyota. It had to substantial. After reading his gibberish, I hope it was alot indeed.

  • avatar
    bluecon

    What is really funny if you can find it is Tom Lasorda from a few years ago bragging about how he new all about auto design.

    That was before he lead the way to the Caliber, Sebring and the rest of the unbelievably bad stuff they came out with.

  • avatar
    NoSubstitute

    I don’t mean to rain on the parade of trash talk, but the new Ram pickup IS excellent (it got 4 stars from you know who), and with its industry leading coil suspension, can credibly be characterized as both innovative and “premium… from the ground up.”

    OK…back to slamming Sebrings and Aspens.

  • avatar
    ermalm

    Jim Press made the top of Toyota Motor Sales in NA, essentially the Marketing arm of Toyota in the US. He is a very good marketer. No more, please.

    He was hired for Chrysler on these talents. Not for Engineering, Finance or Janitorial duties. He is doing what he does best and should be accorded with due deference.

  • avatar

    ermalm :

    “[Press] should be accorded with due deference.”

    I couldn’t agree more.

  • avatar
    stars9texashockey

    Why are we wasting time talking about a company whose coffin is being lowered into the ground as we speak?

  • avatar
    dougjp

    The laugh of the day! ” If there’s one company in America that can build high-craftsmanship, innovative vehicles, it’s Chrysler “.

    Tell that to my wife who slashed the top of her hand by simply reaching in to the glove box area in a rental Caliber….

  • avatar
    Redbarchetta

    If there’s one company in America that can build high-craftsmanship, innovative vehicles, it’s Chrysler

    I want what this guy is smoking. Just think if that stuff makes Chrysler cars look like high craftmanship and innovative what would it make average looking boring women like, supermodels with a brain.

    That one comment is going to win him the Lutzie award this year hands down. How could Bob say anything more delusional?

  • avatar
    windswords

    psarhjinian:

    ‘If Mercedes-Benz built a pickup truck, that’s what it would be, said Press.’

    “Wow.

    Mercedes, essentially, built the Sebring, Caliber, Compass, Patriot, Aspen and Avenger. Between those and their own stellar quality, I don’t think Merc is exactly the name to drop.”

    Tru dat. But it’s not Dumblers actual record he is referring to but their reputation. You know, a car “built like no other” (excuse me while I hurl). In most (non automotively aware) peoples eyes, that’s what Mercedes is.

  • avatar
    jkross22

    There is a difference between substantive marketing and pr messages and bald faced lies.

    Jim sold his soul to the devil, err, Cerberus.

  • avatar
    RedStapler

    Welcome to the Bi-Polar world of Mopar.

    Innovative, class leading designs like the Ram and Wrangler selling next to also ran crap like the Sebering and Compass.

    I still think that Chrysler is small enough to be turned around with new management after going through a Ch11. Other companies have come back from worse (Harley)

    In theory you could purchase a Sprinter chassis cab, add a upfitter stake or utility pickup body and slap three pointed Star on the grille and you’re good to go.

  • avatar
    Lee

    Jim Press, the Dick Cheney of the Auto world.

  • avatar
    NickR

    ‘If there’s one company in America that can build high-craftsmanship, innovative vehicles, it’s Chrysler,’

    I am reminded of those Simpson’s episodes where someone says something stupid in front of a crowd and there’s dead silence and then one little *cough* in the background. The Simpson’s does that so well.

    How many trips did the company jet take to Amsterdam before they put it up for sale?

    I realize these guys have to be cheerleaders, but they should at least balance that against being somewhat credible. I love the headline for this news item.

  • avatar
    DweezilSFV

    What’s wrong with a little puffery ? Anyone????

  • avatar

    I think Chrysler has a chance of surviving if they take the approach of Honda, which picks its market segments carefully and still doesn’t compete in all segments. Chrysler could can a bunch of models and stick to those segments where it’s competitive: Jeep (minus the Compass and Commander, maybe add a Wrangler based pickup to give Chrysler a compact truck), Dodge trucks, Minivans and the LX RWD models.

    BTW, Robert, did you see how Cerberus said that it’d be willing to put $2B from Chrysler Financial into the parent automaker?

  • avatar
    timd38

    It must be the Asian women that make him think like that.

  • avatar
    ttilley

    Chrysler could can a bunch of models and stick to those segments where it’s competitive: Jeep (minus the Compass and Commander, maybe add a Wrangler based pickup to give Chrysler a compact truck), Dodge trucks, Minivans and the LX RWD models.

    I’ll give you Jeep, minus Compass and Commander…and minus Liberty…basically, will you settle for Wrangler?

    But that’s a niche market.

    Outside BK, what do they do with all the dealers that won’t be needed to sell only Wranglers?

  • avatar
    jerry weber

    I truly feel sorry for this whole situation. First, I have a 2006 300C and it makes no trouble. I like most of the car. The bad news is that by now they should have freshened it and put a richer interior in. (give me a reason to trade) Finally, the 300C V8 should look different than the rent a car 300’s selling for $10,000 less. If only Mercedes could have persevered, I think the parnership could have worked, especially as said by another blogger, if chrysler were to be a niche marketer. For all the bad things about Daimler, I have their independent rear suspension and a very nice 5 speed auto from mercedes parts bin. How, they allowed this success to wither (300.s are down 40 some percent) and then went on to wallpaper the marketplace with enough bland underwhelming cars and suv’s to last a lifetime eludes me. Jeep should make wrangers and one or two good suv’s. Dodge should make good pickup trucks. Chrysler needs to make better mini vans and a nice line of sedans in the middle class ($25-40K). If each of these products sold well in it’s niche they would be profitable. Unfortunately, with nothing in the pipeline and myriads of worthless me too stuff out there, I don’t think they have time to restructure.

  • avatar
    PeteMoran

    As Toyota said at the time “We’re pleased he’s found employment at one of our competitors”.

    (Or words to that equally subtle effect).

  • avatar
    dilbert

    Redbarchetta :

    “I want what this guy is smoking.”

    Big stacks of Benjamins, he probably wipes with them too. Who wouldn’t want that?

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber