By on December 5, 2008

Chrysler has been battered in the last two days of congressional hearings. If there’s one thing that everyone in congress seems to agree on, it’s that Chrysler isn’t worth the hassle. Not only is it the smallest of the three automakers, but the Cerberus issue has loomed large as well. Today alone Nardelli told representatives at least twice that as far as he was aware, Cerberus didn’t have the funds to revitalize Chrysler. Needless to say this didn’t go over particularly well (private equity is deliciously easy to demonize), and Nardelli was looking increasingly stressed as the hearings dragged on. Probably aware that it’s about to become a sacrificial lamb (or, in a last-ditch sympathy ploy), Chrysler has reportedly hired law firm Jones Day as bankruptcy counsel, according to the Wall Street Journal. Neither side has confirmed or denied the move, but since the WSJ is quoting “people familiar with the matter” it must be true. Corinne Ball, who previously worked on the Dana Corp reorganization, GM’s Daewoo acquisition and “many cases involving the United Auto Workers union,” is said to be handling the case.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

32 Comments on “Bailout Watch 257: Chrysler Hires Bankruptcy Counsel...”


  • avatar
    dmw

    “Jones Day” is the firm.

  • avatar
    romanjetfighter

    Does this mean C11 is a good bet? If so, that means Ford n GM go C11 too? Should I sell my Ford stock? :/

  • avatar
    Edward Niedermeyer

    Brain fart amended. Thanks!

  • avatar

    A sliver of me feels for Nardelli – he’s trying to make something out of scraps. Being the glutton for punishment he is, he sticks it out instead of saying “eff it – I’m outta here.” Cerebus put him out there as sacrificial lamb. If his head rolls by the decision of the free market, their hand should come with it.

    The government might use the $7B that Chrysler’s after as a backstop to pad the suppliers and dealer communities when they go C11-cum-C7, to give GM a fighting – yet slim – chance at surviving.

    @romanjetfighter: I think the insinuation is that C11 for Chrysler is the lesser of 3 evils, and Congress is hinting at that.

  • avatar
    TexN

    The report I read indicated that they had been hired a few weeks ago. It doesn’t change the severity of the situation, but I don’t think it was in response to the ass-kicking Chrysler has taken in the past 48 hours. The only hiccups Chrysler going down will cause is in the suppliers that are overly dependent on them and the communities with plants. (Toledo is screwed.) With a 10% market share, those ripples won’t be that great in the big picture assuming Ford and GM are bailed out and become viable.

  • avatar
    Rix

    Ford stock is as high risk as they come. It isn’t investing anymore- it’s gambling. (or speculating, as the polite term would be).

  • avatar
    Pch101

    It’s no coincidence that this story was leaked today.

    It’s also no coincidence that the automakers wanted to have hearings today, when the jobs numbers were released. That employment report ensures that the 2.8 will be getting some cash.

  • avatar
    1996MEdition

    How does this impact the international mouse fur trade and plastic milk jug recycling industries?

  • avatar
    br549

    I think we’re reaching a point in this saga where too many people are lending far too much significance to every little drib and drab of information that comes down the line. The fact that Sen. Shelby is being quoted ad nauseum attests to our insatiable appetite for bailout junk food.

  • avatar
    menno

    What say we B&B scrape a few hundred bucks together each and buy up “American Motors Corporation” out of the ashes, snag the Toluca, Mexico car and engine plants, as well as rights to as many 5-star dealers as we can sign on? Maybe snag the tools & dies, rights to the Journey, as well. (Hey, Mexico is part of “North America” after all – so it kind of still fits the name).

    Then offer the AMC PTCruiser, AMC Journey, and contract for production of other cars on two year contracts.

    How about a version of the Montgomery, Alabama built Hyundai Sonata, sold as the AMC Ambassador? (Also buying Mongtomery built drivetrains for use in the Journey, too – no real work to slip the 4 cylinder in – it’s essentially the same one Chrysler builds now.)

    Maybe talk the Toyota/Peugeot/Citroen collaborative factory into selling some Aygo/107/C1 based cars, which would be marketed as the AMC Gremlin (natch!)

    Isn’t this what Cerberus would have done, anyhow? Something along these lines?

  • avatar
    RedStapler

    Demand for recycled milk jugs will go down now that they are not being made into Chrysler Interiors.

  • avatar

    Demand for recycled milk jugs will go down now that they are not being made into Chrysler Interiors.

    Having rented a Dodge Caliber recently I can agree with that!

    John

  • avatar
    Pch101

    I think we’re reaching a point in this saga where too many people are lending far too much significance to every little drib and drab of information that comes down the line.

    Not at all. Leaking this story is a veiled threat for what will happen if Chrysler doesn’t have its demands met. Since Nardelli can’t flaunt this in front of the committee without looking like an opportunist, the next best thing is to leak it to the media, without an attributable source. If it’s in the WSJ, you can bet that everyone is going to see it, which makes it a great place to spread the message.

  • avatar
    no_slushbox

    Re: “private equity is deliciously easy to demonize”, don’t forget that 20% of any bailout of Chrysler will still be benefiting the foreigners that ruined them. Also, ownership doesn’t really need to be a factor, they are the smallest and have no future products – that makes it relatively straightforward to let them be the “Lehman” of the group.

    Pch101:

    It’s a pretty damn risky strategy, I can see (and definitely hope to see) Senator Corker say, “[h]ey, they’ve already got bankruptcy counsel; now we don’t have to waste our time merging them into GM just to have GM shut them down.”

  • avatar
    Wolven

    Personally, I’m delighted to hear Chrysler might be going CH11. If they do, I think they could come out far better off than GM or Ford… WITHOUT any guv’mnt money.

  • avatar
    200k-min

    Chapt. 11, yeah right. Chrysler would be going straight past 11 down to chapter 7. I can’t think of any sane investor that would put money towards a Chrysler reorganization. At least towards an independant Chrysler.

  • avatar
    jkross22

    @jgh:

    Nardelli knew what he was getting into when he signed on with Chrysler. He’s undoubtedly being paid handsomely for his time.

    I think the word ‘temerity’ is more appropriate.

  • avatar
    Pch101

    It’s a pretty damn risky strategy

    I don’t see this as being risky, and it strengthens their hand by raising the threat of pulling out the big gun. If I was them, I would do the same.

  • avatar
    Bunter1

    Rix-I think I would rate GM stockas far riskier.
    Ford has cash to run for a while, if congress is unimpressed GM stock will go zero fast. May be no opportunity to get out at all.

    Ford, you may lose-but there will be something left.

    My thoughts.

    Bunter

  • avatar
    CarnotCycle

    If Chrysler went to Chapter 11 or even 7, I think what would emerge would be Jeep, and that’s about it.

    Jeep is a niche brand with an enviable product in the Wrangler. Jeep Wrangler if you trace the whole thing back to the WWII original, is in a very select group of vehicles that are timeless in their appeal and demand. Others in this group include the VW Beetle, Porsche 911, and the whole brand that is Harley-Davidson. Not many other members in that club.

    Jeep by itself and run well could be something Warren Buffet might want to buy. It would be a company that doesn’t have spectacular growth prospects, but its primary product and image puts it in a “competitive castle” surrounded by a moat from competitors, and generates steady cash-flow year after year after year. I hope the Chinese don’t buy it, talk about an ironic sign of the times if they do.

  • avatar
    no_slushbox

    Pch101:

    Chrysler’s “big gun” is pretty small, they have about 56,000 US employees. Circuit City had about 45,000 employees at the time of bankruptcy.

    For flakes like Dodd or Pelosi this trick might work, but for the fiscal conservative Republicans Chrysler having already retained bankruptcy counsel just makes that option look more viable. Corker has already pointed out that Chrysler is just riding GM’s coattails, and would not justify bailout talks on its own.

    GM is playing the best strategy in regard to begging for money: “We will not last past the year, but we haven’t even thought of bankruptcy because it is so scary. There is no Plan B.”

    This news regarding Chrysler just shows that they have a Plan B already in the works.

    200k-min: For Chrysler I have no problem with Chapter 7. I hope foreigners get Jeep, it is a cursed brand that has killed every company that has owned it (ok, well, except Daimler).

  • avatar
    Pch101

    Chrysler’s “big gun” is pretty small, they have about 56,000 US employees.

    Yes, but the tide favors the bailout happening, so they may as well do it, anyway.

    Chrysler’s main risk is that the other two get bailed out, but that they get left behind. They have nothing to lose by leaking it, and something to gain.

  • avatar
    Geo. Levecque

    The CEO of Chrysler on TV this morning looked like “death” warmed over, so sad for him eh?
    In deed he is more or less a scrap goat for Cerberus.

  • avatar
    jolo

    Nardelli wasn’t too happy with the direction everything was going. You could see it in his eyes that he was hoping someone would ask about about bankruptcy. When they did, he put the bankruptcy grenade’s pin in his teeth and is still waiting to see who flinches first.

    Smart money is that congress will. They will forget that these companies are where they are at due to their own corporate toxic culture, how badly they let the dealership treat their customers, and let’s not forget the shittymobiles all three of them put out for decades. No, a threat that someone will go under is always a viable solution when dealing with the government with your hand out. The other two are riding Chrysler’s coattails.

  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    The only real question is who will buy Jeep this time?

  • avatar
    CommanderFish

    In the event that it looks like the loan/bailout/whatever falls through or won’t be enough, Nardelli should get back to Auburn Hills as fast as he can (he can take the private jet, I don’t care) and Chrysler should file for chapter 11 as soon as possible.

    Why? If Chrysler can get in and declare bankruptcy before GM, they have a much better chance of getting C11 and not being told to go straight to C7.

    After GM? “They” might say we already saved GM and tell Chrysler to go shove it.

    I think Chrysler has the best chance of actually making it out of C11 and becoming successful, but that’s only IF Cerberus gives it the cash infusions necessary to make it through restructuring.

    Would Cerberus be willing to do that? Well………..

  • avatar
    RedStapler

    If you they wipe the slate clean with a UAW cram down and cull the dealer herd they may be able to make a go of it with fresh owners.

    Could Cerberus “self deal” having a different head of the dog (Limited Partnership) buy a bunch of the debt or provide the DIP financing.

    The other option is that Renault/Nissan or another buyer cherry picks the better parts in Ch7.

    Nissan already has shared rights to the Ram pickup and VW to the Minivan.

    The big question is who gets Jeep? I hope whoever ends up with it gives the USDM Wrangler a good diesel.

  • avatar
    dpeppers

    Here is a moist towelette. Approved

  • avatar
    Ryan

    Crapsler will not be missed.

  • avatar
    windswords

    RedStapler,

    Jeep already has good diesels, they export them out of the port in Baltimore. You just can’t buy them here. Something about our laws won’t let them be sold here. They “pollute” too much. But Europeans don’t think so. They get 30 something miles to the gallon in them. Maybe Americans are stupid.

    Ryan, We are relieved that you won’t be put out by Chrysler’s demise. I can sleep better at night.

  • avatar
    Ryan

    windswords,

    Glad I could help ease your mind. Don’t worry too much, we will bail out Crapsler AGAIN.

  • avatar
    Justcauz

    I can see Chrysler going by the wayside as the US Govt uses many GM vehicles. whereas it appears State and Local Govt, and many heavy duty fleets use Ford.
    Rarely do you see Chrysler being utilized.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber