Find Reviews by Make:
25 Comments on “2009 (?) Converj (a.k.a. Cadivolt)...”
Read all comments
Latest Car Reviews view all
Latest Product Reviews view all
Recent Comments
- Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
- theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
- A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
- Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
- Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...
Car Reviews By Make view all
New Car Research
Who We Are
- Tim Healey
Managing Editor - Matt Posky
News and Social Media Contributor - Timothy Cain
Sales Analyst - Murilee Martin
Junkyard Finds Author - Matthew Guy
Contributor - Chris Tonn
Contributor
- Adam Tonge
- Bozi Tatarevic
- Corey Lewis
- Jo Borras
- Mark Baruth
- Ronnie Schreiber
Beautiful, but as aerodynamic as the Volt prototype…so guess what it will look like in production
Forget the vaporware Volt drivetrain…get that out with the 3.6 v6. Make the interior really nice, and build quality up to what a Caddy should be…and sell a ton of them.
Make this an RWD gasoline-powered chassis and they’ll have my money. Otherwise, no.
Seems the styling’s an absolute hit. I agree totally.
However, the two-door coupe market isn’t where I’d position anything, especially during an economic downturn.
Cadillac’s first production hybrid should be a one-upper to the big players in the form of a 400-hp DTS/STS replacement with fantastic styling and the ability to go even 20 miles without gas and get 30 or more in combined driving. I wouldn’t hurt to make it fun to drive (if possible, with the limitations necessary for fuel economy) and features-compeitive with conventional E-Class/5-Series/A6/M35/M45
If GM had this design for the Caddy Volt variant, then why bother with the Volt in the first place?
Green creds, great looks. Hell, it would sell on looks alone.
I’ll take mine in black.
When I first saw this, I liked it.
Still do, but the more I stare at the pics, the more it looks derived from the G6.
We’ll see if it ever gets built. I’d like to see it in metal.
I suppose I see a bit of G6 Coupe in the car’s overall proportions. However, I believe the resemblance is a coincidence. Keep in mind, the low-front, high-rear shape is aerodynamically efficient. I have absolutely no clue why the G6 models have such high rear ends (especially the convertible), but on this it’s mostly form following function.
This car has a homerun design. Just one more example of the newest GM designs being segement leading entries! If GM decides to go forward with this design and does not alter it when going to production, they will sell the heck out of them !
GM has proven this with vehicles like the Chevrolet Malibu,Cadillac CTS and Lamda based crossovers like the Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia,Buick Enclave and Saturn Outlook. These are segement leaders!
Put in a forced induction ICE, RWD, and keep the weight under 3200 lbs and I’d be really interested.
Oh. Caddy wants to badge-engineer a version of the Eclipse now?
GM has proven this with vehicles like the Chevrolet Malibu,Cadillac CTS and Lamda based crossovers like the Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia,Buick Enclave and Saturn Outlook. These are segement leaders!
Maybe in DET, In the rest of the world, not so much.
This looks great, does anybody else see a resemblance to the Gallardo?
Forget the vaporware Volt drivetrain…get that out with the 3.6 v6. Make the interior really nice, and build quality up to what a Caddy should be…
and sell a ton of them.
Amen! This thing, done right, could be a true BMW 335i/Infiniti G37 fighter.
So much better than Lexus’ adaptation of the Prius. Very sharp. Build it, but build it just like that.
Honestly these look great, I can’t wait to not see one on the road when they’re not produced by ex-GM. Where was this 5 years ago?
Umm, has GM learned nothing?
The Cimmarron was based on the Cavalier.
Umm, the Volt is based on the Chevrolet Cruze (still hate the name)… which makes the Caddy based on the Chevy again…
Need I say more?
CTS-style everything looks great, I have to admit.
It makes sense to try and get some ROI on Volt “tech” via Cadillac.
Before reading TTAC I’d never thought anyone took these little fantasy exercises seriously.
I think you could do quite a funny article on the differences between the styling studies, the show car and the final production car. Once upon a time you could see a direct link, nowadays it just seems a cheap way of getting column inches (or miles in the case of the Volt).
This styling is a LOT better than the current (not sold in the states) BLS or the photos I’ve seen of the upcoming 3-Series fighter. Seriously.
The interior is a bit “out there,” but it could work. The exterior styling is just beautiful.
Only an American company can design cars as exciting and gorgeous as this one; maybe there’s hope.
This looks a lot like the upcoming two door Cadillac CTS. With everyone belly aching that they should make this car with a conventional drivetrain, it turns out that they are.
An electric Chevy-based Cadillac, just as the gas price bubble is slipping into the history books. It’s like the Cimarron all over again, except without the brilliant sense of timing.
Nice looks though. It proves that GM does have some talent hidden away somewhere.
Looks like an XLR and will probably sell in about the same volume.
Call it the Cadillac Cadaver.
So much better than Lexus’ adaptation of the Prius.
Lexus adaptation of the Prius will probably be on sale in a year or so,and will look exactly like the concept. This is at least three or four years away, and won’t look like the image above at all.
This is GM, where flashy concepts and bluster substitute for real cars and actual strategy.