By on February 16, 2009

Pity the print journalists. You work hard to live up to stringent standards of journalistic ethics, collect quotes, confirm sources and generally bust your hump only to have some snotnose with a laptop beat you to the punch. Ken Bensinger of the LA Times knows what I’m talking about. He has a piece today that compares the Chevy Malibu with the Chevy Impala, a contrast he spins into a number of critiques of GM’s product overlap, cannibalism and image-weakening products. Sound familiar? I thought so. As tempting as it might be to blame the family bankruptcy for falling standards, or guffaw at the very notion of a newspaper criticizing an automaker’s business decisions, this isn’t Newspaper Deathwatch. On to the cars.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

8 Comments on “A Tale Of Two Chevys Continued...”


  • avatar
    DweezilSFV

    Caught it this morning. Front page LA Times. All I could think was: ‘This ham bone has been reading TTAC.’

    Such is the level of the LA Times. You just keep doing the right thing when no one else is looking Mr.N. It’s called integrity.

  • avatar

    I’ll take the Caprice

  • avatar
    AutoCorpFin

    Who seriously reads the L.A. Times for car reviews anyway?

  • avatar
    John Horner

    Just as many highly paid journalists are starting to admit that they start their research with The Drudge Report (ugh!), perhaps we will one day see those scribes admitting to getting their ideas from the likes of TTAC.

    BTW, there really is no such thing as a print journalist anymore. Even they are web+paper. Some once significant magazines have gone to an all online business model, including the venerable US News and World Report.

  • avatar
    Scorched Earth

    mmm me likey Impala SS

  • avatar
    Dave M.

    Who seriously reads the L.A. Times for car reviews anyway?

    Uh, Dan Neil.

  • avatar
    shaker

    Lord Vader… your car is ready.

    (Deep voice, heavy breathing) “I trust that the repairs were successful.”

  • avatar
    DweezilSFV

    This wasn’t a “car review” it was a front page story attempting to point out one of the many problems that GM has.

    And something TTAC has already covered.In far greater detail and in more depth.

    It goes beyond cars.It’s almost an editorial given.

    Any so called “newspaper” that has a list of 100 words they will not use for fear of “offending” [“illegal alien” comes to mind]is more about political correctness than who what when where how and why.

    The LA Times is, as usual, late to the game and derivative.And dying.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber