By on April 28, 2009

The Freep reports that the Treasury has blocked GM’s plans to buy Delphi’s unwanted steering business, while putting the kibosh on $150 million in payments that GM had planned to keep its major supplier operating through May. This puts Delphi, GM, The Treasury and creditors on a shorter timeline to resolve Delphi’s three-year-long bankruptcy; a deal must now be reached by May 9. If a deal isn’t reached by then, Delphi will be liquidated, GM will have to buy back mission-critical plants, and new suppliers will be contracted. So now you know why GM is idling most of its plants this summer: if parts stop shipping, there won’t be an (unplanned) production disruption. What isn’t clear is why the Treasury thinks a Delphi liquidation is a desireable outcome. After all, $5 billion has already been earmarked to help guarantee OEM payments to suppliers. Maybe Treasury actually thinks that money would be better off spent on ads. More likely though, the Treasury boyz want a top-to-bottom restructuring to go down next month, and Delphi’s lingering bankruptcy (and estimated $2billion yearly cost over competition according to GM) put it squarely in the “Bad GM” camp. And so it burns.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

9 Comments on “Treasury Wants Delphi Dead...”


  • avatar
    PeteMoran

    Finally! A triage approach is showing signs of life.

    (Irony/pun intended – I refuse to apologize).

  • avatar
    John Horner

    Oddly enough, a government agency is forcing through the kinds of drastic changes which free enterprise wasn’t able to accomplish visa-vis Delphi.

    A company which has been in chapter 11 for three years and has only continued to survive thanks to cash infusions from a former parent company is not a going concern. Delphi needs to be parted out.

  • avatar
    ttacfan

    Wasn’t Delphi the original “bad GM”, separated from the mothership to cook books make GM accountants happy?

  • avatar
    Lokkii

    I get so confused.

    Billions of taxpayer dollars to save a car company and its parts suppliers, except for its major parts suppler. How is GM going to build cars in the short run without Delphi parts?

    Not that I mind Delphi going under like they should have been doing for some years now, but couldn’t we just skip the ‘billions of taxpayer dollars’ part and get it over with and just shoot GM now?

    OK, best and brightest…. straighten me out please..

  • avatar
    menno

    I think that Obama has done this thing to temporarily put a stick in the spokes of Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai, Subaru, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Mitsubishi… the “transplant” companies. Obviously, “duh” with the idea of “benefiting” the so-called US trifecta companies (one fascist-socialist, the other capitalist, and the third socialist-fascist).

    GM will be able to “handle” the huge shut-down because they’re planning one anyway (and there will be plenty of ‘new’ cars available for anyone willing to buy their stuff from an ever dwindling dealer base). Plus taxpayer money in enfitum.

    Chrysler will be able to “handle” the huge shut-down for the same reasons (plus, I’m going to guess the soon to be announced move of all Canadian and Mexican car production capacity into the US for the UAW). So much for “union brotherhood” (CAW, anyone?)

    Put it this way; you can’t build cars without parts. Delphi is a supplier to just about every car manufacturer situated in North America.

    I predict the (usual) unintended consequences; a huge spike in unemployment, a deepening of the recession/depression, and pull-out/US plant closure (and therefore importation of cars) by Mitsubishi, Mercedes-Benz and possibly some of the other weaker transplants.

    How do you say “fugedaboudit” in Japanese and German?

    We’re ruled by a bunch of rubes and idiots in Washington. Wait until the multiple trillions of dollars that they have conjured out of nowhere starts to move around the economy.

    Hyperinflation anyone?

  • avatar
    Landcrusher

    Wasn’t Delphi kept alive because the courts kept GM from pulling the exact same stunt they are trying to pull off now (dumping liabilities on a spun off entity)?

    I’m sorry, but if you are looking for a way to damn free enterprise, the domestic automakers are not a good example. They aren’t all that free, and have not been for decades.

  • avatar
    paris-dakar

    Oddly enough, a government agency is forcing through the kinds of drastic changes which free enterprise wasn’t able to accomplish visa-vis Delphi.

    I don’t know if I’d chalk this fiasco up to ‘free enterprise’. The UAW has alot to do with the death-from-cancer that Delphi has been suffering from.

  • avatar
    Geo. Levecque

    It makes sense that all vehicle production should be done in the USA, I sense the only reason that the Detroit three makes vehicles anywhere else is that its cheaper in both wages and to a lesser extent shipping of product to the Market, what’s going to happen to the CAW is a good question as far as vehicle production, the CAW has other irons in the fire in other industries, but vehicle manufacturing is a big percentage of there dues! We all live in interesting times eh?

  • avatar
    snafu

    Agreed the legacy cost associated with the union (bennies&wages) along with the huge jobs banks that guaranteed 85% of those JB’ers hourly wages for a spread of 3-5 years. Then you have all the untold stories that if collectively assembled into one tell tail bio, would exemplify some of the poor business practices that go on inside of Delphi. Foolish decisions, speculating, with a blind eye to internal issues needing addressed.

    Yes this is the spin off that GM needed to finagle some fiscal slight of hand and at the same time, Battenberg and Dawes were pilfering pennies from the Delphi coffer until that came to a head in October 05. One of the underlying issues today is the fact the Delphi rule is still largely done by a management reared from the GM gene pool since its spin off in 99. These issues haven’t gone unnoticed by those customers of Delphi.

    In the 42 months while in bankruptcy the stigma of bad decisions and counterproductive activities have been blanketed by carry over products and designs that in most divisions do not have an advantage over their competitors, for the most part but not all. Those customers kept a Delphi business alive by trickling awarded programs thus creating leverage against other suppliers that has helped to keep new product costs low as Delphi struggled to competitively price their products. Warning Will Robertson, it will take another couple years for this ugly kid to fully rear its head as some of those decisions made are starting to become apparent.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber