Find Reviews by Make:
24 Comments on “What’s Wrong With This Picture: Connect the Dotz Edition...”
Read all comments
Latest Car Reviews view all
Latest Product Reviews view all
Recent Comments
- Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
- theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
- A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
- Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
- Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...
Car Reviews By Make view all
New Car Research
Who We Are
- Tim Healey
Managing Editor - Matt Posky
News and Social Media Contributor - Timothy Cain
Sales Analyst - Murilee Martin
Junkyard Finds Author - Matthew Guy
Contributor - Chris Tonn
Contributor
- Adam Tonge
- Bozi Tatarevic
- Corey Lewis
- Jo Borras
- Mark Baruth
- Ronnie Schreiber
It was taken by the original Batman camera guy low point of view so everyone looked taller than they really are and at an odd angle. or maybe the camera tripod fell over
Someone forgot that chicks only make car pictures cooler* if you can actually see them.
*Or more worth looking at in any case.
What’s wrong with the picture? Physics do not exist at all.
Um…..what is that in the distance there? A car with some wheels on it? Really? And what’s the shiny thing next to it? A mod…wha?! You’re putting me on.
Oh and everything looks crooked compared to anything else in the pic.
I think she used to be a man.
As so often seems to be the case with these, I don’t get it.
That’s simple, just look closely. It means that there will be no more Chevys and Dodges in NASCAR.
It seems to me that some suspicious Photochopping has resulted in some perspective challenges.
I know that the 8J TT has 312mm or 340mm front brakes and smaller rear brakes. That car appears to have the same wheel & brake configuration both front and rear. Image has been photochopped.
http://www.dotzmag.com/15452_EN?modul=tabelle&form=lnk&action=show&uid=16456&table=alcar/custom/16454&field=Image1920&head=jpeg&pos=2688
carlisimo :
April 1st, 2009 at 7:59 pm
As so often seems to be the case with these, I don’t get it.
Seconded. Often, these seem to be much ado about nothing. Or, at least, very little.
Nothing is wrong with this picture. I always park my squeaky clean sports car in abandoned warehouses to meet up with super hot homeless chicks.
Hoky Sh!t the building is fall over !!
The hot chick seems to be on a leash to keep her away from the hot car. And the background is highlighted instead of the car and woman. Totally bass-ackwards.
What do I win ?
too much front overhang
Nothing. Nice car, nice girl.
1. Now that she accidentally got it in there, how the hell will she get it out?
2. Too much front overhang (on the car). But it is an Audi.
No way is she keeping that car from rolling “downhill” with that skinny leg of hers…
there isn’t a damn thing wrong with that picture. But the blonde on their website makes that ho look a little rough.
Another reason I think it’s been shopped are the reflections of the lights on the car…. the lights on the ceiling of the building are round… but the lights reflected in the car don’t match up….
We won’t even talk about the problems with the shadows and the backlighting….
If that car is going downhill, am I the only one who wants to see the “after” pic with the car crashed into a wall and her underneath it?
The chick is looking like she wants to drive that hot ride, but never learned to drive a manual?
Her bellybutton looks hairy.
There were no Audis in ‘Cloverleaf’?
I don’t see Eliot Spitzer anywhere?
She’s wearing too much clothing. Hey, you asked….