Speed cameras have emerged as a top political issue in the province of Manitoba, Canada. The ruling New Democratic Party (NDP) is standing by its controversial decision last week against issuing refunds for motorists who were issued speed camera tickets in so-called highway work zones when no workers were present. In January, a court declared that such tickets violated the law (view opinion), but the NDP maintains that payment of a ticket is an admission of guilt. The opposition parties are making the most of the situation.
“The NDP government has claimed to have a Justice Department which stands for fairness and justice, and yet that claim was shattered yesterday when the minister said he would be neither fair nor just to those who were caught unfairly by his cash-grabbing photo radar,” Liberal Party Leader Jon Gerrard said on Thursday.
The opposition pointed out that the province and city of Winnipeg generated massive amounts of revenue from construction zones. The number of tickets issued jumped from 3000 in 2007 to 60,000 in just twelve months. Manitoba Premier Gary Doer refused to order refunds, insisting the basis for the court ruling was “a technicality.”
“We side with the Winnipeg city police who argued that for safety reasons and for the proper deployment of police officers photo radar was a good tool for law enforcement in Manitoba,” Doer said.
During a parliamentary question period in the legislative assembly, opposition critics presented the cases of dozens of motorists who were unfairly ticketed.
“A woman with several children was given five tickets in the Bishop Grandin construction site — before even receiving the first ticket in the mail,” Progressive Conservative Party Leader Hugh McFadyen said. “In every case, 7:20 in the morning, no workers on site, traveling below the normal speed limit. Does [Mr. Doer] think it’s appropriate to hold on to this person’s money — when the judge has already said that it was wrong for this American company to ticket her in the first place — on behalf of this cash-strapped NDP government?”
Government officials, for the most part, ignored the jabs.
“The mighty Conservative Party can be the mighty pandering party all it wants,” Doer said.
Photo enforcement has proved to be a powerful electoral issue. In 2001, the Liberal Party in the province of British Columbia campaigned on a promise to ban speed cameras. On election day, voters threw out the ruling NDP party and gave Gordon Campbell’s party an astonishing 77 out of 79 seats in the legislature. The first act of Campbell’s new public safety minister was to outlaw photo radar on June 28, 2001.
Despite the political risk, a great deal of money is at stake with the refunds for the NDP government in Manitoba. A total of $43,994,765 CAD in construction zone ticket revenue remains uncollected.
“The NDP are sitting on more than $40 million of unpaid court-ordered fines, yet the people who received and paid photo radar tickets issued in construction zones while no workers were present are being told by the Minister of Justice they are out of luck,” Manitoba Progressive Conservative Justice Critic Kelvin Goertzen said in a statement.
“It’s almost a disincentive for Manitobans to pay their fines because under the NDP, if the law is challenged, the only way you get your money back is if you didn’t pay. Under the NDP’s backwards and unfair policy, it might get even harder to get people to pay their fines.”
My mom lives in Winnipeg, the capitol of Manitoba. They have speeding cameras in many places. She got an expensive speeding ticket, because instead of slamming on the brakes when the light turned yellow, she stepped on the go-pedal to get through the intersection and earned the speeding ticket. She says many people now drive very carefully, usually even below the speed limit so they don’t get into such a situation. Sounds like a place more suitable to driving tractors…
The NDP party is like the Democrats on steroids. They came into being with the avowed purpose of ending capitalism.
They were in power for a short time in Ontario in the ’90’s. Managed to destroy the economy and started up the photo radar cameras which the next government wisely did away with.
One thing that is never considered is that if you slow down traffic by ten percent you will also increase the number of vehicles by ten percent. Which is more dangerous?
Cameras are used the same way in Calgary. Example: 1:30am, a .7km long merge lane. Downhill. Construction zone, no workers, photo van at the end of the downhill merge lane. Posted speed limit after the van was 50km/h. The road is straight and 4 lanes wide. 2 days after I saw that photo van there, the “construction zone” signs were removed, speed limit raised to 80km/h. Nothing changed in those 2 days.
This is why I have a radar detector.
If you ever get a chance to check out http://www.trapster.com, let us know your thoughts. It’s a mobile phone, Garmin, and TomTom application that alerts you to speed traps, live police, red light cameras, etc.
Here in Quebec, we’re just embarking on this wagon.
Today, May 19th, is the first day that 15 photo and red-light cameras begin operation. It is a “pilot-program” which has been propagandized so much as the answer to all road-safety issues, that one cannot say anthing non-positive without being cast as irresponsible, or not caring about safety.
Do we, too, have to go through thousands of unfair tickets, court challenges, cases, frustrations, anger, suspended licences, increasing accident rates anyways before, some years down the road, these things get removed?
What a silly way to run a society.