Find Reviews by Make:
22 Comments on “What’s Wrong With This Picture: Wall-E Edition...”
Read all comments
Latest Car Reviews view all
Latest Product Reviews view all
Recent Comments
- Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
- theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
- A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
- Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
- Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...
Car Reviews By Make view all
New Car Research
Who We Are
- Tim Healey
Managing Editor - Matt Posky
News and Social Media Contributor - Timothy Cain
Sales Analyst - Murilee Martin
Junkyard Finds Author - Matthew Guy
Contributor - Chris Tonn
Contributor
- Adam Tonge
- Bozi Tatarevic
- Corey Lewis
- Jo Borras
- Mark Baruth
- Ronnie Schreiber
Well lets see. Maybe the fact that none are for sale and out of the three only the Jeep will make it to market by way of Fiat. The other two are pipe dreams, just one offs that are advertised just to say hey we are alive for now and if we did do better in the decision making department they would be out in two year or so. Its a same really they all look good. Unlike alot of folks I dont wish death on these guys I just wish they made better products. Now that Fiasco Fiat will own them I wont touch them. I remember Fiats when they were here. I hated them then and there is a reason why they had to leave the US market.
There’s nothing wrong with this picture. It’s a perfect example of a Photoshop rendering.
oooh, I like this fake Chrysler more than the real one.
Is that wrong?
What’s wrong? It points out Chryslers total lack of engineering capability. You have a Mercedes chassis under the Jeep, vaporware under the 200C, and a Lotus Europa under the (fake) electric car – also known as a blatant Tesla ripoff.
Pipe dreams are exactly what Chrysler has to bring to the table.
FIAT may if they are lucky sell about as many units as VW in the US. The Asian brands are what dealt FIAT their death knell the first time around by building longer lasting cars.
I’d be surprised if FIAT can maintain a viable presence in the US through the next decade.
A good looking Chrysler sedan. That’s what’s wrong.
One Mercedes platform SUV, one Lotus platform sportscar, one complete vapormobile.
Products of Pixar Motor Company.
Shouldn’t they all be eco-box Yugo styled hybrids sporting the Obama emblem? Plus, why build Jeeps anymore with the environmental left’s goal (and that their party is the majority) to shut down access to anything that isn’t already paved?
Chryslers that might actually sell if they were available? Or is it cars that could have saved taxpayers billions of dollars had they come out several years ago?
It’s my tax money being wasted on ads for cars that don’t exist, can’t be bought and would each cost me more tax money for every unit sold until hell freezes over. So, yeah, that’s what’s wrong with the picture.
Does everyone want Tesla to have the market for tiny electric two-seaters all to itself?
Jeep gets its Hot New Model as an ’11. So they say, at least.
The ones for Dodge and Chrysler, on the other hand, are apparently floating around in some bizarre unrealizable Meinongian nether region.
All of you are correct, but this advert is much more sinister, diabolical and misdirecting.
You see, the message here is “Look at the Future of Chrysler.” So you, the regular “non-car guy” consumer looks at that photo and says…
“Suh-weeet. I want one of those. I’ll save my money and get one.”
There’s only two problems with that.
– The first problem is that you’ll not buy one of Chrysler’s current products, and they need you to buy Chryslers NOW to save the company. But they message they’re telling you is “BUY LATER.”
– By telling you to “BUY LATER” that really means, “Send us more bailout money NOW!”
– Meanwhile, the message they keep sending us is “Fiat will save us. You will soon be able to buy Fiats and that will save Chrysler.”
So actually, that’s three messages. All of them bogus.
Shouldn’t they all be eco-box Yugo styled hybrids sporting the Obama emblem? Plus, why build Jeeps anymore with the environmental left’s goal (and that their party is the majority) to shut down access to anything that isn’t already paved?
Considering Obama drove a 300C before he found religion, I highly doubt it.
And then there’s the Escape Hybrid he drives now (tagline: “What to drive when you want to look green, but without looking like you hate America”) which isn’t too far off what an electric Jeep would probably be used for.
If Obama’s a leftist, I’m Lenin reincarnated.
The New Capitalism: Selling pictures of cars which don’t exist to politicians.
The best part is that you can replace all those overpaid UAW workers with some twelve-year-olds and a box of pencil crayons.
psarhjinian :if Obama’s a leftist, I’m Lenin reincarnated.
Dear God man I have waited along time to meet with you Mr Lenin. LOL
One will be out soon and the other two are nice renderings on what they could do if they wanted.
Wheel size has an inverse relationship with cargo capacity.
It’s not worth $2bln?
Oooh, I know! There’s not a Toyota or Honda emblem on any of those vehicles.
The 200C Electric looked better as an Audi A6?
-and is in even more urban myth territory than an actual production Chevy Volt?