By on June 10, 2009

We’ve given you the heads-up on the federal government’s plans to favor domestic automakers with “stimulus sales.” And so it has come to pass. The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) reports—eight days after the fact—that they’ve ordered 17,205 “fuel efficient vehicles” at a cost of $287 million. Breaking it down: Uncle Sam bought 2,933 Chryslers ($53 million); 7,924 Fords for ($129 million); and 6,348 General Motors vehicles ($105 million). Does it strike anyone as odd that FoMoCo gets the largest contract? Not-so-secret hat tip for NOT taking bailout bucks, while competing against those who have? Or just a reflection of the fact that the Crown Vic rules! Which reminds me: by NOT revealing the exact models ordered, one has to wonder about the depth of the GSA’s commitment to greening-up the fed’s fleet. On this point, the press release is suitably vague, and yet completely revealing . . .

GSA is committed to spending Recovery dollars quickly and wisely,” said Commissioner James A. Williams of GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service. “Simultaneously, we are focused on acquiring vehicles that will provide long-term environmental benefits and savings by increasing the fuel efficiency of the Federal fleet.”

Each new fuel efficient vehicle replaces, on a one-for-one basis, operational motor vehicles in the federal inventory that met replacement standards.Each new vehicle will have a higher miles-per-gallon (MPG) rating than the one it replaces.

Where are these vehicles built? U.S. only? Canada? Mexico? South Korea? TTAC is investigating, looking for the exact specs.

Anyway, one day, the domestics will compare themselves to something other than themselves. Or their cross-town rivals. And then, maybe, the feds will set an actual fuel efficiency standard for their fleet. And allow all automakers to compete for their biz, and reward excellence rather than political realities.

Me, I’m not in the breath-holding biz.

[Thanks to Frank Williams for the tip.]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

12 Comments on “Feds Order 17,205 “Fuel Efficient” Chrysler, Ford and GM Vehicles...”


  • avatar
    tedward

    how is this any different than existing fleet requirements to buy American?

  • avatar
    ca36gtp

    Democrats stuck between the UAW and the Sierra Club. Yum.

  • avatar
    Stingray

    From which CSI came that pic?

    If it was Miami… man, put the blonde of that series… or “H”.

    A Hummer is a efficient fuel burning vehicle.

  • avatar
    menno

    Rhetorical question: How many of these vehicles are built in Canada and Mexico? (I know, I know; you’re looking into it; I’m not trashing TTAC). US manufactured cars have the first digit in the VIN of either a 1 or a 5 (since 1981).

    And how many American jobs would be kept in the gravy train by buying American manufactured cars such as the Hyundai Sonata (Montgomery, Alabama), the Toyota Camry (Indiana and Tennesee), the Nissan Altima (Georgia, is it?), the Subaru Legacy (Indiana).

    I’m just askin’ that’s all.

  • avatar
    commando1

    Almost all Fords are “fuel efficient” because there’s a tiny little shiny badge stuck on their butt thats says “Flex-fuel“. That makes them acceptable. Right?

    Hell. No self respecting lowly government pencil pusher should expect anything less than a Crown Vic. We don’t need no stinking Prius.

  • avatar
    KixStart

    So, in addition to the scorn and invective that government servants often get, many of them will also be treated to the joys of a stick Cobalt Special Value XFE?

  • avatar

    Menno:
    the Nissan Altima (Georgia, is it?)

    Smyrna, Tennessee and Canton, Mississippi.

  • avatar
    quiksilver180

    “Fuel Efficient” Chrysler? And what exactly would that vehicle be? The Aspen Hybrid? Ha!

  • avatar
    dcdriver

    I’ll bet they bought a lot of SUVs. I see a ton of FedGov Suburbans around DC.

  • avatar
    threeer

    Most of the government vehicles I see on base locally are Pontiac G6 (guess those won’t be an option soon), older Chyrsler Sebrings and an occasional Ford Fusion. I’d be curious to see the breakdown of the new purchases to see what I’d be stuck driving if I had to secure a government vehicle for any reason.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    “Does it strike anyone as odd that FoMoCo gets the largest contract?”

    I wonder how many of them are Escape Hybrids? The Escape Hybrid is a useful vehicle for many different purposes and doesn’t have any real competition from GM or Chrysler.

    “And allow all automakers to compete for their biz, and reward excellence rather than political realities.”

    I’m sure we are soon to see the Japanese government buying Hyundais, the Germans buying Nissans and the French government stocking up on Volkswagens. Not likely

  • avatar
    Lumbergh21

    I wrk for the California Department of Health and have the joy of choosing between a 12 year old Jeep, a 10 year old Full size 4WD Dodge truck, and an 8 year old Durango. I’ve got uncomfortable, uncomfortable and dangerous, and comfortable (relatively) and dangerous. Oh yeah, and none of them get as good gas mileage as my 58 Chevy truck. I wish I got to drive a Crown Vic. A lot of the people in my office would rather pile the miles up on their own vehicles than drive one of the state vehicle.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber