By on September 20, 2009

(courtesy:childrenshistoricalpublishing.org)

The UAW’s Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association funds were originally negotiated with each of the Detroit automakers, creating three separate funds to handle obligations for each of the OEM’s unionized workforces. But the turmoil of the bailout has left the VEBA funds gasping for cash. With the manufacturers unable to meet their VEBA obligations in cash, the union was forced to take significant stakes in GM and Chrysler instead. Now, the WSJ reports that the three VEBA funds will be unified into a single administrative body. Each automaker will have a separate account within the overall VEBA structure, but the unification should help keep down administrative costs. Still, the fact that significant amounts of Chrysler and GM equity will be held by the same body raises some important concerns.

In fact, the Employee Benefits Security Administration has already had to propose an exemption to its rules just for VEBA. GM and Chrysler’s equity handovers would typically have been too large a transfer of employer securities to meet current EBSA guidelines. Oh, and those assets aren’t “qualified investments” either, under the current rules. Wait, why wouldn’t “common stock representing 17.5% of GM’s equity, $6.5 billion in preferred stock, a $2.5 billion promissory note and stock warrants to purchase up to 2.5% of the new GM’s equity” be considered “qualified investments”? Probably because VEBA is going to have a challenge on its hand when it has to convert those “assets” into cash.

Though the proposed exemption removes any legal issues with the transfer and it clearly has the administration’s backing, the decision exposes VEBA to considerable risk. After all, those rules probably existed for good reasons. And even if those assets do prove to be worth something, the unification still means VEBA and its contributing automakers have to worry about conflict of interest.

“It is conceivable there could be, down the road, conflicts between the accounts of the different car companies in the VEBA,” explains Labor Department spokesman Alan Lebowitz. “But, the [exemption] proposal requires that the committee adopt mechanisms for dealing with any such springing conflicts.” That shouldn’t be too hard . . . right?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “UAW Unifies VEBA...”


  • avatar
    Dimwit

    Incredible contortions that underline just how close to bankruptcy GM and Chryco are. It won’t be long before those funds are officially government funded.
    I wonder what Ford will do or is it up to the UAW to stick its oar into this mess?

  • avatar
    Gardiner Westbound

    It’s the ol’ shell game, except there are three shells and no pea.

  • avatar
    GS650G

    Just cut the Treasury Check for 60 or 70 billion and call it done. What’s another couple of billion dollars at this point anyway. We aren’t about to pay off the debts incurred in this past year anyway.

  • avatar
    jpcavanaugh

    I can see it now. Ford gets to support the entire UAW in its old age.

  • avatar

    It’s a shell game alright, but Mr. Westbound they’re $767 billion in peas so far.

  • avatar
    Da Coyote

    Yup, those union bosses really knew how to get a good deal for their stuckees – er – suckers.

  • avatar
    lw

    The cash will run out long before the ownership stakes will be convertible.

    Expect the treasury to buy portions of these stakes from the VEBA at fictitious prices to keep it from running dry.

    IMHO – Even fully funded with cash from the big 3, the VEBA wouldn’t have enough to cover the UAW. Remember that many of these workers slugged it through the bad days and many have serious medical conditions because of it.

  • avatar
    Geo. Levecque

    As I note here in Canada, Health costs are on a long upward spiral with no end in sight, sure it costs more to live here in Canada, most of our Taxes go to support our Health Care services plus here in Ontario everyone in the Province including Old age Pensioners pay a extra charge of $900.00 and down per year for Health Tax, me thinks its does not go to Health but ends up in general Tax, then come next July 1st we also have the HST(Combined GST and Prov. Tax), ahh living is so much fun!

  • avatar
    rnc

    The hope (and that’s not a good word in this case, but it is what it is) and a main part of GM’s survival plan (b4 and after BK) is that within the next ten years a large majority of the retirees from the 70’s (when GM had 50% market share) will die and benefits (health and pension) would come more in line with current workforce. Additionally these retirees would be from the 80’s forward when they were no longer treated like pieces of machinery and health cost will fall (for the VEBA).

    I do not think that the VEBA will last for GM and CryCo, I wonder if the UAW will try and get Ford’s employees to allow use of thier funds until equity can be cashed out (I bet solidarity doesn’t go that far). And this may be a good thing for the D3, a) the union will have to make concessions for additional funding for the VEBA and b) they will find how hard it is to run a business based on taking a hamburger today and hoping to be able to pay for it on tuesday and the costs/sacrifices that have to be made in the process (could actually be what finally breaks the UAW from within itself).

  • avatar
    Logans_Run

    No actually if you have been following the story there is $10 billion buried in the healthcare bill that would be made available to the VEBAs. They will still be short since the UAW actuaries have used rosey actuarial assumptions regarding the future liabilities of the VEBAs. lw makes a good point about the sale of the equity stakes in GM and Chryco. The government will figure out a way to inflate the value and get cash to the VEBAs. My guess is that they will declare the UAW a bank (after all GMAC/Ally is now a bank)and allow them to pledge the equity at the open window with the FED. The banks have been able to do it with worthless MBOs why not let the UAW do it with worthless car company stock. All I know for certain is that we will be paying for this for a long, long, long time with either government debt or the ill-effects of the Bernanke printing press and resulting ultimate tax of inflation and currency devaluation. Ron Paul for President!

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber