By on February 14, 2011

Infiniti will show this C-segment coupe-hatch, named Etherea, at the Geneva Auto Show, as a glimpse at the brand’s 2014 time-frame compact, front-drive offerings. But, for those of us who grew up in the 80s, the Etherea’s name is at least as likely to recall the distant planet that served as the home of He-Man’s twin sister, She-Ra. But rather than serving as the battleground between the Rebellion and the evil forces of Hordak, the Etherea is a new opportunity to highlight the hybrid drivetrain from the M35h as well as “innovative access arrangements” that Infiniti is keeping secret for now. Which is probably for the best… apparently She-Ra was a Panther girl

.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

27 Comments on “What’s Wrong With This Picture: Infiniti’s Crystal Castle Edition...”


  • avatar
    MattPete

    All of Infiniti’s designers need to fired.
     
    The only attractive cars they’ve ever built were the original Q45 and the last M45 (albeit a bit bland) and the original FX.
     
    I want to like their cars, but they are always weird, but not in a good way.  For example, the G35 (original and current) looked effeminate, slab-sided, ill-proportioned, with a mix of ricer.  The coupe added a touch of Altima blandness (actually, he Altima of that era looked nicer).
     
    The M30 looked like a Japanese economy sedan.  I’ll actually give Infiniti a break on this one, as this seems to have been a temporary model imported to shore up their lineup.
     
    The J30 was a good start — for a prototype.  The final result was blech with a mix of bad packaging.
     
    The original M35 would have been cool — in the 1970s.
     
    The 2nd and 3rd Gen Q45 would have been cool — in the 1980s.
     
    The I was a Maxima.
     
    The G20 was handsome from the rear,  OK from the sides, and looked like a Corolla (or was it a Geo?) from the front.
     
     
    The thing pictured above looks like Bangle-ized Z4 roadters stretched to coupe form:
     
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/BMW_Z4_II_sDrive23i_front_20100420.jpg

    • 0 avatar

      I had a first generation Q45… Nice to know someone else out there appreciates the good clean design (aside from the 1987 Civic hatchback nose, anyway). Good performer too. Just a shame they left out seat heaters, otherwise it was a perfect (now) cheap luxo barge with a proper sonorous gas hoovering V8 and tidy handling.

    • 0 avatar
      SVX pearlie

      I like the G35, and can’t understand why Nissan decided to screw it up for the G37.

      The old Altima was better-looking. To say nothing of the 300ZX.

      Now it’s all screwups, like the QX.

      Right now, I can’t think of a single Nissan / Infiniti I’d be happy to be seen driving.

  • avatar
    Conslaw

    The sound that you hear is the Pontiac Aztek and Subaru Tribecca laughing. 

    I guess this saves Pixar the work of designing a villain car for Cars 3.

  • avatar
    mdwheary

    God, that’s even uglier than the QX56. What are they smoking at the Infiniti design studios?

  • avatar

    The Urethra?  What kind of a dick would drive one of those?

    • 0 avatar
      MRF 95 T-Bird

      A Urologist named Dick. BTW Go back several decades Buick used to be refered to as the “Doctor’s Car” Apparently the reasoning went that they were at the price point above Chevy and Pontiac but below Cadillac.

  • avatar
    Zackman

    Wow. I think their designers must be in competition with one another of who can design the goofiest looking vehicles! I guess someone may like it, but…not me. Is it just me, or are too many of the front ends – headlights and grilles of cars coming from Asia starting to look like snakes and dragons? If so, why?

  • avatar

    Good god, why do car designers (in general) feel the need to make vehicles willfully ugly nowadays? I’ve seen a trend towards this in the last few years (ever since we got used to the Bangle-ized BMW line everyone has taken the cue to start making cars that are so avant garde they are hideous).
    All the more reason for me to stick to my favourite vehicular era – 1989-1998. For bikes and cars that is the pinnacle of clean design and good performance before the electronic nanny state took the fun out of everything, and Chris Bangle perverted the world’s sense of aesthetics.

  • avatar
    rpol35

    It would have fit in well in “Cars” as the smart-a$$, snarky sophisticate.

    • 0 avatar
      panzerfaust

      I was thinking along the same lines, this car looks like Lighting McQueen’s divorce lawyer.  I’ve seen plenty of cars that looked like the designers deliberately made the front end look like a face, but I’ve never seen a car that the rear end looked like a face as well.

  • avatar
    carve

    Ahhhhh…it looks like a kitty…or maybe toothless the dragon from “How to train your dragon”.
    That huge 1/4 window by the A-pillar is awful.
    It’s still better than the QX56 though.  I’m glad it doesn’t have a pot-belly bulging grille or fake ventiports.
    If only Infiniti’s looked more like Kias.  Never thought I’d say that.

  • avatar
    Rod Panhard

    MY EYES!

  • avatar
    redliner

    Infinity can’t let Nissan have all the fun with the Juke. They need something for Juke owners to aspire to in the Infinity brand. This is it.
     
    I miss the older BMW designs. What happened to simple and sophisticated, like 2002 5-series or a 2001 7-series?

  • avatar
    invest100

    Dumb name but I love the looks. 

  • avatar
    zigpenguin

    I know this is secondary, but…
     
    Where are the rearview mirrors?

  • avatar
    vent-L-8

    it’s been a long time since a car actually looked sinister, i approve.  Would you rather everyone drove Corollas?

  • avatar

    I actually like the way this vehicle looks. I like the detail on the sides and the front, but it would be nice if the back were a little different looking.
     
    http://www.autotransportdirect.com

  • avatar
    mpresley

    Japanese car design (if you can call it that) has always looked as if the designer’s creative faculties atrophied sometime around the junior-high school years.

  • avatar
    Tommy Boy

    The front-end is somewhat reminiscent of a shark.  Perhaps they’ll market it to personal injury lawyers.

  • avatar
    Monty

    I love this! If this goes into production as is, it will be instantly recognizable as a Infiniti – unlike the hordes of Crucivrollas on the road.

  • avatar
    LectroByte

     
    As we say here in East TN, just two big ol’ whiskers away from bein’ full-on catfish!

  • avatar
    dolo54

    That C pillar (or in this case would you call it a D pillar?) is really awful. Infiniti should stop trying to channel Bangle.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: @Carlson Fan – My ’68 has 2.75:1 rear end. It buries the speedo needle. It came stock with the...
  • theflyersfan: Inside the Chicago Loop and up Lakeshore Drive rivals any great city in the world. The beauty of the...
  • A Scientist: When I was a teenager in the mid 90’s you could have one of these rolling s-boxes for a case of...
  • Mike Beranek: You should expand your knowledge base, clearly it’s insufficient. The race isn’t in...
  • Mike Beranek: ^^THIS^^ Chicago is FOX’s whipping boy because it makes Illinois a progressive bastion in the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber