Standing outside a building that typically hosts weddings in downtown Chelsea, Michigan, a fellow auto journalist and I chatted through our masks about how it’s getting harder and harder to write about crossovers, because so many of them are just in that happy middle – not particularly great, and certainly not bad.
Add the 2022 Volkswagen Taos to that list.
The Taos shares the MQB platform with a lot of the VW lineup, including the compact crossover Tiguan. The Taos slots in one size below, with the Subaru Crosstrek and Kia Seltos in its sights.
Having spent time on the same drive loop in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive versions, I can tell you that the newest VW crossover is just, well, fine.
What it is not, at least not from a product sense, is a replacement for the outgoing non-GTI/R Golf.
I asked about that during a virtual briefing before I hoofed it to Michigan and VW management types said that yeah, the Taos is meant to replace the Golf. And from a purely business perspective, that makes sense.
But if you think that the Taos is a raised version of the Golf, which also uses the MQB platform, let me disabuse you of that notion right now. It looks, feels, and drives more like a shrunken Tiguan than it does a Golf.
That’s not a bad thing. The Tiguan is a perfectly pleasant, if not overtly sporty, machine. The Taos does feel a tad sprier than the Tiguan, but otherwise, it’s a pretty standard commuter crossover.
(Full disclosure: VW hosted me for dinner and put me in a hotel so that I could sample the Taos.)
Regardless of which drivetrain layout you pick, there’s just one engine choice: A 1.5-liter turbo-four that makes 158 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque. Front-wheel drive Taos models get an eight-speed non-DSG automatic, while AWD models get a seven-speed DSG automatic.
On the road, the FWD model felt a bit sportier than the heavier AWD model, and a bit more responsive to throttle input. Our drive loop wasn’t super challenging – it consisted mostly of relatively gentle corners – so the Taos didn’t need to sweat too much, but it did seem to hold its own when pushed. When pushed a bit too hard body roll exhibited itself and the tires got a bit squealy, but as is usual, I need to point out few crossover buyers will be that aggressive with this machine.
VW has given more heft and tightness to its steering in this application, and that’s good. I found the ride acceptable, even on broken pavement, erring on the side of stiff.
Acceleration was far from bonkers, but it felt good enough for the daily grind. Both cars did struggle a bit with one quick uphill after a stop sign, with the heavier AWD model struggling more. That model seemed a bit more hesitant to downshift and the throttle response felt slightly slower, at least in that one specific spot.
All-wheel-drive versions do get drive modes, and predictably, the Sport mode tightens up the steering and livens up throttle response while also making shifts more aggressive. It also felt, to me, as if the ride stiffened a bit, though VW tells me that engaging the Sport mode doesn’t change the suspension.
The biggest dynamic flaw was noise – specifically tire noise, though some wind noise intruded, too. The tire noise provided a deep rumble that wasn’t easily covered by cranking the tunes. Perhaps it was a tire/pavement mismatch, but regardless, the volume level was high, especially considering this is a family crossover, not a sports car.
Inside, you get the familiar all-black VW interior that prioritizes function over style, though it’s now dressed up with digital gauges. Everything is logically placed and easy to use, though one of the cars I drove – the AWD model, I think – seemed to have an issue tuning XM radio via the knob. It just skipped over stations that I could otherwise call up via direct tune.
Roominess and comfort are pluses – even the backseat didn’t feel too cramped for this over-large editor when I hopped back there to shoot pics. I had no trouble getting a good driving position set, and visibility is good.
There are three available trims – S, SE, and SEL. Both the FWD and AWD cars I drove were SEL models, with the FWD SEL priced out at $32,685 and the AWD model at $35,835. Base pricing is $22,995 for front-wheel drive and $25,040 for all-wheel drive. None of those prices include the $1,195 destination fee.
Standard features on S include cloth seats, 17-inch wheels, LED lighting all around, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, digital gauges, USB ports, Wi-Fi, push-button start, automatic headlights, black roof rails, and climate control.
Available features on S include heated front seats, front assist, blind-spot monitor, rear-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control with stop and go, lane assist, travel assist, emergency assist, light assist, heated steering wheel, and rain-sensing wipers.
SEs add 18-inch wheels, 8-inch infotainment screen, leatherette/cloth combination seats, satellite radio, wireless charging, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, remote start, keyless entry, heated front seats, front assist, blind-spot monitor, and rear-traffic alert as standard and panoramic sunroof, adaptive cruise, lane assist, rain-sensing wipers, travel assist, emergency assist, light assist, and heated steering wheel as part of the options list.
Choose the SEL and you get 18-inch wheels with FWD or 19s with AWD, LED adaptive projector headlights, illuminated grille, navigation, Bose audio, dual-zone climate control, heated steering wheel, rain-sensing wipers, leather seats, cooled front seats (AWD only), rear park distance control, adaptive cruise, lane assist, emergency assist, road-sign display, travel assist low with traffic-jam assist, and light assist. A panoramic sunroof is the only option.
Looking over the features list – which is not all-inclusive, I left some minor stuff out for the sake of brevity – I’d almost choose a loaded SE over the SEL because I could give up nav with CarPlay or Android Auto. The Bose audio and dual-zone climate controls, plus maybe the leather seats, are the only features that I’d struggle to sacrifice. Obviously, feature choice is subjective – but a loaded SE doesn’t give up much to the top-dog trim.
As for choosing between AWD and FWD, well, the AWD does give you the Sport mode but the FWD model did feel a tad more sprightly. Obviously, the AWD model will appeal to Snow Belters (despite the debate over how necessary it is for inclement weather) and those who plan to hit the trailhead (though the Taos’ off-road specs suggest it’s best not to traverse the more-challenging trails), but unless you really need it – or a Sport mode – the FWD model serves well enough.
Fuel economy is listed at 28/36/31 for FWD models and 25/32/28 for AWD cars.
The Taos manages to fit right in the middle of the class. It’s not quite as stylish as the Seltos – it has more-conservative looks than the Kia – or quite as trail-ready as the Subaru. It’s priced about the same as a three-cylinder, mid-trim Ford Bronco Sport, but it’s not as off-road-oriented as the Ford. It does, however, have a nicer interior in terms of materials and perhaps design.
It feels a tad quicker than a Chevrolet Trailblazer, if not quite as responsive in cornering. It feels a bit more upscale than a Jeep Compass but doesn’t offer an off-road trim.
And so on, and so forth. The Taos ends up be a well-rounded compact crossover SUV that does a lot right, but which isn’t notably sporty/stylish/off-road capable. It’s just fun enough to drive to stave off boredom, and NVH issues aside, it’s comfy for the commute.
That makes it, well, fine.
What’s New for 2022
The 2022 Volkswagen Taos is an all-new compact crossover.
Who Should Buy It
Those seeking to find a solid all-around compact crossover that does many things well but isn’t a specialist in any one category.
[Images © 2021 Tim Healey/TTAC]
You have the transmissions backwards. AWD models get the DSG, FWD get the 8 speed.
You are correct, that was an editing error and has been fixed. Thanks!
I like that the screen is integrated into the dashboard.
Other than that though I don’t think I’m the target demographic.
This interior gets on me really old, really fast.
Tim, am I correct in perceiving that the base S model is available without any driver assistance nannies like automatic braking and lane assist? If so, perhaps I would risk VW’s spotty reliability and try a Taos.
Sounds like those are in a separate $900~ package…
Correct. Available in one of two packages. Most of the aids are also optional on SE.
This is good news as far as I’m concerned. Thanks.
“…the SEL and you get 18-inch wheels with FWD or 19s with AWD…” I assume this is the cause of the excessive tire noise you noted? Maybe downsizing to a 17″ with a taller sidewall and quieter brand/tread pattern could help?
Wow. Almost a $10K jump from the S to the SEL???? That’s quite a bit of money.
Also, on the Tiguan, I have read that the FWD gets a bit squirrelly in tight turns and that its worth it to get the AWD. Did this Taos feel planted in turns??
Yes, generally planted with little body roll.
Again, always, still…….what is with VW and the naming of its vehicles?!?!?! Even an obligatory alphanumeric naming convention would be better.
Perfect Mexican name. It will probably made in Pueblo, hence Taos
You are on the right track, they claimed they named it Taos after the ski resort area in New Mexico North of Santa Fe! https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a36536754/2022-vw-taos-drive/
Lets track further
“The English name Taos derives from the native Taos language meaning “(place of) red willows”.
The Taos language of the Northern Tiwa branch of the Tanoan language family is spoken in Taos Pueblo, New Mexico. ”
I mixed up Puebla and Pueblo.
Reading through the segment members is just sad.
I guess I’m the last to see it, but I’ve just realized that all VW SUVs just look like scaled versions of each other. Atlas, Atlas Cross Sport, Tiguan, ID4, Taos.
Kia fell into this rut with its sedans, and Audi, BMW, and Mercedes have been there for a long time.
Agreed. However, at least the VW does fit the melted blob shape as some of the over CUV’s out there.
I’ve said this for years. Just boring
Agree, but I think in 10 years this Taos will stylistically look better than the swirls, swoops and janky angles of the current offerings elsewhere.
They really missed the mark with the front end, though. It looks like the grille is thoroughly disappointed and disgusted with having to spend its entire existence on the front of a VW.
How will this affect Bremach naming their new SUV Taos? (if it ever appears – Im looking at you Mahindra!)
They’ve already removed these names
They call it SUV and PU now – http://bremach.us/
Here they call SUV and Brio (PU)
http://bremachusa.com/models/bremach-4×4-suv-line/
I wonder if DUMB-U-V is taken yet?
So much hate for a wonderful UAZ?
Compared to Crosstrek, why not CX30?
Small SUV, 19″ wheels, slim tires… just does not make sense to me. I have these fat tires on Highlander. They can take any punishment.
I’m admittedly in the market for something like this, eventually, but still nothing checks every box. Seems similar in form & function to Seltos, which I’d probably choose over this. VW always appeals to me for straightforward design, but just know of too many horror stories. Still like CX-30, but wish it had 4″ more wheelbase and more colors. Tuscon has grown too big, Kona seems kind of cheap-in good and bad ways.
Soul
On paper, the Seltos checks all the boxes. And then in-person, there’s just something….off….about the design. The full face light bar doesn’t impress me….
Am I correct in reading that VW is listing some features as options that are standard on their competitors? Things like heated front seats, and blind spot monitoring, which I have been informed are ‘must haves’ on any of our future auto acquisitions.
Doesn’t VW do options groups like most mfgs? Perhaps its the base model where those things are optional.
BSM will be on the S but you have to pay for the pleather and heated seats, at SE or SEL level.
Lame.
It looks like a Jeep. You only need a new grill with 7 slots
So it’s $2k cheaper than the Tiguan but smaller, and more updated but considerably less powerful (and the Tiguan is already not powerful). That’s a lotta weight for a 1.5L.
Golf even in heavier SW format has 147hp with 1.4, to pull 3,053 lb. That’s 20.76 pounds per horse.
Taos has 158hp to pull 3,740 pounds. 23.67 pounds per horse.
We’re going backwards here.
Sounds like it needs, at minimum, the 1.8t mill used in the 2015-2018 model years
At 23k, there’s some value, but the high end trims of this are crazy expensive compared to Mazda’s options.
Even though current design is on it’s way out, the CX-5 Touring packs a lot of value if you want something around that size.
This is the class that is now generic car, and this is one of the most generic members of it.
Well, you all will be happy to know that the “new” 1.5l engine’s many quirks, including bad shuddering and hesitation, have apparently been sorted out on European guinea-pig customers over the last two years. Hopefully.
You’d think this belt in oil cam drive wonder had been sorted out in the 1.4l version, and that an extra 100cc of roaring displacement would have been a simple matter of a little more bore. But remember, this is VW at work. Someone probably had a genius thought they incorporated which screwed everything up.
Of course, the Tiguan has the Budack Ding Dong Cycle version of the VW 2.0t engine, which is gasping for breath by 4500 rpm, so there’s precedent for VW to make yet another load of old rope and foist it off on the masses.
Oh God, the Tiguan engine. It’s so bad.
caranddriver.com/reviews/a28758732/2019-vw-tiguan-by-the-numbers/
Look at those rolling acceleration times. It is slower than a Corolla Hybrid.
One the one hand, I’d love to see VW do the GTI treatment on this model, but on the other hand, it would cost a small fortune.
Another remarkably…forgettable VW. The sort of car that 10 years from now, you’d be challenged to prove this even existed.
Forgotvergnugen.
SEL trim appears to be an appalling value for money as far as the powertrain goes – with your $35k fully-loaded SEL AWD you get the same engine as the $22k base, with 30 fewer horsepower than the $23k base CX-30, never mind the $31k 250-hp Turbo AWD.
So, which trim comes with the color-changing paint option? Just wondering for a friend of mine, whose hobbies totally do not include robbing banks.